Question:
I finally asked my ENT’s office for my audiogram and scanned it. (I’m the 43-year-old who doesn’t feel like I need hearing aids to function.) The right ear is worse because at the time there was fluid in the middle ear. It’s better now.
I’m not sure what AU, AS, and AD mean. They’re not used consistently enough for me to quite figure out. (One seems to mean left in one place and right in another.) I’m still at a loss as to what caused the hearing loss, but oh well . . . <http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/audiogram.jpg> — http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
First off, AU is binaural, AD is right, and AS is left. Second, your loss shows a sensorineural loss, not conductive or mixed and therefore is not the result of fluid, sorry this one is permanent. I think you are the one I came down on pretty hard before. My advice is to go back and read what I wrote then, I am sticking to it, you are a hearing aid canidate, whether you want to admit it or not. Without a doubt I have complete faith that you would benefit from binaural hearing aids. When the word list were read to you for discrimination, they were read at 75 and 70 dBHL in order for you to get 100%, normal conversation is about 45 dBHL. Obviously if you are still thinking about this, then you know that it is a problem, do something about it. Signed, Your "tough love" audiologist In article <pSDdd.4177$ta5.1…@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>, del…@mindspring.com says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I finally asked my ENT’s office for my audiogram and scanned it. (I’m > the 43-year-old who doesn’t feel like I need hearing aids to function.) > The right ear is worse because at the time there was fluid in the middle > ear. It’s better now.
> I’m not sure what AU, AS, and AD mean. They’re not used consistently > enough for me to quite figure out. (One seems to mean left in one place > and right in another.) > I’m still at a loss as to what caused the hearing loss, but oh well . . . > <http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/audiogram.jpg>
Response:
In article <MPG.1be0d758fd01cc33989…@news.snet.sbcglobal.net>, Susan <susanbl…@snet.net> wrote: > First off, AU is binaural, AD is right, and AS is left.
Thanks. That helps. I could not find that explained anywhere. > Second, your loss shows a sensorineural loss, not conductive or mixed > and therefore is not the result of fluid, sorry this one is permanent.
Part of the loss in the right ear was conductive; I had surgery, and, yes, it is now better, probably more like the left. You’ll note it does say at the bottom there is (was) conductive loss.
> I think you are the one I came down on pretty hard before. My advice is > to go back and read what I wrote then, I am sticking to it, you are a > hearing aid canidate, whether you want to admit it or not. Without a > doubt I have complete faith that you would benefit from binaural hearing > aids. When the word list were read to you for discrimination, they were > read at 75 and 70 dBHL in order for you to get 100%, normal conversation > is about 45 dBHL.
I hear normal conversation quite well, however. Like I’ve posted before, I don’t hear other people’s private conversations clearly from 30 feet away, but I hear it under normal circumstances and even in crowded restaurants. > Obviously if you are still thinking about this, then you know that it is > a problem, do something about it.
Well, my ex-roommate is an ENT, and she’d asked to see the audiogram, so I finally asked the ENT’s office to send it to me so I could send it to her. Just thought I’d post it. I’m not sure why you’d come down hard on anyone based on numbers. I never noticed a hearing loss ’til I got fluid in my right ear and had this test, nor does anyone else notice I have one (now that the fluid’s been cleared out). When I told my geriatric nurse specialist friend, she was quite surprised; obviously, she deals with the hard of hearing (including her own husband). I’ve been to an ENT and an audiologist; he explained quite clearly the "permanent and progressive" aspect, and I do get it. He also gets that after he did the surgery, my hearing improved. You wouldn’t hear too well with a middle ear full of fluid, either. When I woke up in recovery and took the cotton he’d left in my ear, there was a HUGE difference. I also think that you should take into account a person’s functionality before asking them to make a huge investment. Yes, I could benefit if I were a very social person or if I had certain kinds of jobs, etc. But right now I can hear quite well for what I need. As I said before, I’ll be happy to invest when I get to the point where I feel uncomfortable or that I am missing things I shouldn’t or when people obviously are frustrated with me. I’m sure when I do get hearing aids I’ll realise that music sounds very different. As it is, most people ask me to repeat myself because I’m softspoken.
I do want to follow others’ experiences because I do know someday I will need hearing aids, so that’s why I’m here. — http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
> Part of the loss in the right ear was conductive; I had surgery, and, > yes, it is now better, probably more like the left. You’ll note it does > say at the bottom there is (was) conductive loss.
The bottom was unreadable, sorry, but the truth to deal with NOW is that the hearing loss is sensorineural and unimprovable. As for the rest of it, it is bullshit, sorry plain and simple. How can you say that " Yes, I could benefit if I were a very social person or if I had certain kinds of jobs, etc. But right now I can hear quite well FOR WHAT I NEED. As I said before, I’ll be happy to invest when I get to the point where I feel uncomfortable or that I am missing things I shouldn’t or when people obviously are frustrated with me. I’m sure when I do get hearing aids I’ll realise that music sounds very different." I would not be a good audiologist if I let people get away with that cliche speech, how could anyone not be worth a better standard of life? no matter what that lifestyle involves. PS- YOU DON"T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE MISSING WHEN YOU CAN’T HEAR BECAUSE YOU CAN’T HEAR WHAT YOU ARE MISSING.
Response:
In article <MPG.1be109c459e732c6989…@news.snet.sbcglobal.net>, Susan <susanbl…@snet.net> wrote: > I would not be a good audiologist if I let people get away with that > cliche speech, how could anyone not be worth a better standard of life? > no matter what that lifestyle involves.
You would not be a very good audiologist if you don’t listen to your patients and their psychological and emotional needs, either. > As for the rest of it, it is bullshit, sorry plain and simple.
Sorry, but you’re not me, so you can’t possibly know this. And the audiologist I went to, who actually interacted with me, she wasn’t nearly as sure as you are that I need hearing aids. Her recommendation was for a second test after the fluid was resolved because it was the primary impairment. > How can > you say that " Yes, I could benefit if I > were a very social person or if I had certain kinds of jobs, etc. But > right now I can hear quite well FOR WHAT I NEED. As I said before, I’ll > be happy to invest when I get to the point where I feel uncomfortable or > that I am missing things I shouldn’t or when people obviously are > frustrated with me. I’m sure when I do get hearing aids I’ll realise > that music sounds very different."
So you’re saying I should spend thousands of dollars so I can hear every word of private conversations people 30+ feet away at the lakefront are having over the crash of the waves, as opposed to some and even most of it? WHY? Why do I need to hear other people’s conversations? > I would not be a good audiologist if I let people get away with that > cliche speech, how could anyone not be worth a better standard of life? > no matter what that lifestyle involves.
Again, tell me how hearing this kind of thing improves my "standard of life"? > PS- YOU DON"T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE MISSING WHEN YOU CAN’T HEAR BECAUSE YOU > CAN’T HEAR WHAT YOU ARE MISSING.
Well, since I never noticed a decline, since I play things at EXACTLY the same volume as I always have, since no one else noticed a decline, and since I’ve never done anything obvious that would damage my hearing, and since my friend and I went through an exercise where we compared how we hear things, and we came out the same, I’m not sure that I’m missing as much as you seem to think. Why do you have so much hostility? — http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
Susan <susanbl…@snet.net> wrote in message <news:MPG.1be109c459e732c69896f1@news.snet.sbcglobal.net>… > I would not be a good audiologist if I let people get away with that > cliche speech, how could anyone not be worth a better standard of life? > no matter what that lifestyle involves. > PS- YOU DON"T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE MISSING WHEN YOU CAN’T HEAR BECAUSE YOU > CAN’T HEAR WHAT YOU ARE MISSING.
Susan, you are dead on in your assessment. This is some of the worse denial I have ever heard when it comes to hearing loss. The original poster claims, "I hear normal conversation quite well, however. Like I’ve posted before, I don’t hear other people’s private conversations clearly from 30 feet away, but I hear it under normal circumstances and even in crowded restaurants." I agree with Susan, BS! Not with that audiogram you don’t. I’ll only disagree with Susan on one point…. This person IS NOT a candidate for hearing aids. Sure, audiometrically she’s a candidate but you’re not fitting the audiogram. You’d be fitting a person that is in deep denial and she would never be successful. So, while I agree that based on the audiogram alone, she would benefit from a binaural fitting, her denial will prevent her from every being successful. Montag Audiologist
Response:
I concede to your point and her ignorance. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ll only disagree with Susan on one point…. This person IS NOT a > candidate for hearing aids. Sure, audiometrically she’s a candidate > but you’re not fitting the audiogram. You’d be fitting a person that > is in deep denial and she would never be successful. So, while I agree > that based on the audiogram alone, she would benefit from a binaural > fitting, her denial will prevent her from every being successful. > Montag > Audiologist
Response:
I wouldn’t have expected you to end up calling names???…GG "Susan" <susanbl…@snet.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1be1bd3774bd56f49896f2@news.snet.sbcglobal.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I concede to your point and her ignorance. >> I’ll only disagree with Susan on one point…. This person IS NOT a >> candidate for hearing aids. Sure, audiometrically she’s a candidate >> but you’re not fitting the audiogram. You’d be fitting a person that >> is in deep denial and she would never be successful. So, while I agree >> that based on the audiogram alone, she would benefit from a binaural >> fitting, her denial will prevent her from every being successful. >> Montag >> Audiologist
Response:
"Diane L. Schirf" <del…@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:%OMdd.4501$ta5.2189@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <MPG.1be109c459e732c6989…@news.snet.sbcglobal.net>, > Susan <susanbl…@snet.net> wrote: >> I would not be a good audiologist if I let people get away with that >> cliche speech, how could anyone not be worth a better standard of life? >> no matter what that lifestyle involves. > You would not be a very good audiologist if you don’t listen to your > patients and their psychological and emotional needs, either. >> As for the rest of it, it is bullshit, sorry plain and simple. > Sorry, but you’re not me, so you can’t possibly know this. And the > audiologist I went to, who actually interacted with me, she wasn’t > nearly as sure as you are that I need hearing aids. Her recommendation > was for a second test after the fluid was resolved because it was the > primary impairment.
I agree with Susan in that you have enough hearing loss ON PAPER to be a candidate for hearing aids. Maybe you could try to find a local audiologist who could demo some aids for you. That gives it a try at least. However if you are adamant that you don’t need them now, you might not be willing to invest the time and effort and it would be a waste of money at this point. But I would recommend strongly trying to demo some first. >> How can >> you say that " Yes, I could benefit if I >> were a very social person or if I had certain kinds of jobs, etc. But >> right now I can hear quite well FOR WHAT I NEED. As I said before, I’ll >> be happy to invest when I get to the point where I feel uncomfortable or >> that I am missing things I shouldn’t or when people obviously are >> frustrated with me. I’m sure when I do get hearing aids I’ll realise >> that music sounds very different." > So you’re saying I should spend thousands of dollars so I can hear every > word of private conversations people 30+ feet away at the lakefront are > having over the crash of the waves, as opposed to some and even most of > it? WHY? Why do I need to hear other people’s conversations?
This is an unrealistic expectation of what hearing aids do. Even people with no hearing loss have problems in this situation. However, you may not realize how much of your conversations you are really missing… JennL.
Response:
I didn’t. In article <cl94g202…@news1.newsguy.com>, mrhiggins1 @noodlessbcglobal.net says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I wouldn’t have expected you to end up calling names???…GG > "Susan" <susanbl…@snet.net> wrote in message > news:MPG.1be1bd3774bd56f49896f2@news.snet.sbcglobal.net… > > I concede to your point and her ignorance. > >> I’ll only disagree with Susan on one point…. This person IS NOT a > >> candidate for hearing aids. Sure, audiometrically she’s a candidate > >> but you’re not fitting the audiogram. You’d be fitting a person that > >> is in deep denial and she would never be successful. So, while I agree > >> that based on the audiogram alone, she would benefit from a binaural > >> fitting, her denial will prevent her from every being successful. > >> Montag > >> Audiologist
Response:
If your hearing is good, why are you hear? On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:10:51 GMT, "Diane L. Schirf" – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -<del…@mindspring.com> wrote: >In article <MPG.1be109c459e732c6989…@news.snet.sbcglobal.net>, > Susan <susanbl…@snet.net> wrote: >> I would not be a good audiologist if I let people get away with that >> cliche speech, how could anyone not be worth a better standard of life? >> no matter what that lifestyle involves. >You would not be a very good audiologist if you don’t listen to your >patients and their psychological and emotional needs, either. >> As for the rest of it, it is bullshit, sorry plain and simple. >Sorry, but you’re not me, so you can’t possibly know this. And the >audiologist I went to, who actually interacted with me, she wasn’t >nearly as sure as you are that I need hearing aids. Her recommendation >was for a second test after the fluid was resolved because it was the >primary impairment. >> How can >> you say that " Yes, I could benefit if I >> were a very social person or if I had certain kinds of jobs, etc. But >> right now I can hear quite well FOR WHAT I NEED. As I said before, I’ll >> be happy to invest when I get to the point where I feel uncomfortable or >> that I am missing things I shouldn’t or when people obviously are >> frustrated with me. I’m sure when I do get hearing aids I’ll realise >> that music sounds very different." >So you’re saying I should spend thousands of dollars so I can hear every >word of private conversations people 30+ feet away at the lakefront are >having over the crash of the waves, as opposed to some and even most of >it? WHY? Why do I need to hear other people’s conversations? >> I would not be a good audiologist if I let people get away with that >> cliche speech, how could anyone not be worth a better standard of life? >> no matter what that lifestyle involves. >Again, tell me how hearing this kind of thing improves my "standard of >life"? >> PS- YOU DON"T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE MISSING WHEN YOU CAN’T HEAR BECAUSE YOU >> CAN’T HEAR WHAT YOU ARE MISSING. >Well, since I never noticed a decline, since I play things at EXACTLY >the same volume as I always have, since no one else noticed a decline, >and since I’ve never done anything obvious that would damage my hearing, >and since my friend and I went through an exercise where we compared how >we hear things, and we came out the same, I’m not sure that I’m missing >as much as you seem to think. >Why do you have so much hostility?
Response:
In article <ad74617f.0410210604.3492f…@posting.google.com>, mon…@gmail.com (montag) wrote: > I don’t hear other people’s private conversations clearly from 30 feet > away, but I hear it under normal circumstances and even in crowded > restaurants." I agree with Susan, BS! Not with that audiogram you > don’t.
But I do. I’ve even had to repeat something for someone sitting next to me at lunch who’d missed something at the end of the table. Remember, the right ear improved once the fluid was drained, so the audiogram is a bit out of date. — http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
In article <cl94g202…@news1.newsguy.com>, "Gary G" <mrhiggi…@noodlessbcglobal.net> wrote: > I wouldn’t have expected you to end up calling names???…GG > "Susan" <susanbl…@snet.net> wrote in message > news:MPG.1be1bd3774bd56f49896f2@news.snet.sbcglobal.net… > > I concede to your point and her ignorance.
I’m disappointed because it’s not only unprofessional, but it points to a real lack of the type of understanding most health care professionals exhibit (including my geriatric nurse friend, who laughed outright at the idea I need hearing aids). The audiologist I went to, who interacted with me, has a different opinion about my "need" for hearing aids — and that was before the fluid was drained. Apparently, she’s ignorant, too. We who are closest to the situation are all ignorant. — http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
In article <NCWdd.7485$gq2.2226@trnddc01>, "ModernMiko" <modernm…@NOverizon.net> wrote: > This is an unrealistic expectation of what hearing aids do. Even people with > no hearing loss have problems in this situation. However, you may not > realize how much of your conversations you are really missing…
I hear everything said to me from within a reasonable distance and can repeat it back, unless it’s whispered. Whispering’s always given me problems. When I go back to the ENT for the surgery follow-up, I might ask for a demo from the audiologist. But, like I said, she thought I did pretty well without. — http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
In article <d0ggn0pd3h2ha0bggvvrbeccdrma0ls…@4ax.com>, Stu-R <st…@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > If your hearing is good, why are you hear?
Because it’s a progressive loss, so when it does get worse, I do want to have info about hearing aids, cost, care, etc., so I can ask good questions and so I know what to expect. (I said something like that orginally in a more abbreviated form, but it got lost in all the yelling.) I don’t say my hearing is "good"; I have no noticeable problems at this time. — http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
"Diane L. Schirf" <del…@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:9zYdd.5161$ta5.4280@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <NCWdd.7485$gq2.2226@trnddc01>, > "ModernMiko" <modernm…@NOverizon.net> wrote: >> This is an unrealistic expectation of what hearing aids do. Even people >> with >> no hearing loss have problems in this situation. However, you may not >> realize how much of your conversations you are really missing… > I hear everything said to me from within a reasonable distance and can > repeat it back, unless it’s whispered. Whispering’s always given me > problems. > When I go back to the ENT for the surgery follow-up, I might ask for a > demo from the audiologist. But, like I said, she thought I did pretty > well without.
How about in crowded situations or with a lot of background noise? — JennL
Response:
If you want professional, come see me in my office setting. I use this forum to cut to the point–my understanding is that that is why most people are here, they want the realistic, non-sugar version (opinions) of what they are hearing from other sources. In article <nvYdd.5156$ta5.1…@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>, del…@mindspring.com says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <cl94g202…@news1.newsguy.com>, > "Gary G" <mrhiggi…@noodlessbcglobal.net> wrote: > > I wouldn’t have expected you to end up calling names???…GG > > "Susan" <susanbl…@snet.net> wrote in message > > news:MPG.1be1bd3774bd56f49896f2@news.snet.sbcglobal.net… > > > I concede to your point and her ignorance. > I’m disappointed because it’s not only unprofessional, but it points to > a real lack of the type of understanding most health care professionals > exhibit (including my geriatric nurse friend, who laughed outright at > the idea I need hearing aids). The audiologist I went to, who interacted > with me, has a different opinion about my "need" for hearing aids — and > that was before the fluid was drained. Apparently, she’s ignorant, too. > We who are closest to the situation are all ignorant.
Response:
I don’t have as bad of loss as your audiogram claims yet odd, I cannot hear 30ft away, even in a quiet setting, me thinks something is off a wee bit. — "Diane L. Schirf" <del…@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:WsYdd.5152$ta5.3693@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <ad74617f.0410210604.3492f…@posting.google.com>, > mon…@gmail.com (montag) wrote: > > I don’t hear other people’s private conversations clearly from 30 feet > > away, but I hear it under normal circumstances and even in crowded > > restaurants." I agree with Susan, BS! Not with that audiogram you > > don’t. > But I do. I’ve even had to repeat something for someone sitting next to > me at lunch who’d missed something at the end of the table. > Remember, the right ear improved once the fluid was drained, so the > audiogram is a bit out of date. > — > http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
As simply as It can be stated – when you don’t feed a given signal to the brain for a long time, the connection for that frequency or sound level in the brain atrophies, like an unused muscle. When you eventually do feed the brain that signal, it is then very difficult or impossible to recover the connection. Neurons need activity to stay alive. It’s like exercise and cardiovascular health. We use instruments and measurement to extend our ability to deal with problems beyond what our senses tell us. By the time our senses tell us of many diseases, it’s too late to do anything about them. Ignoring measurement is like playing Russian roulette. If you don’t trust an audiologist, try the Miracle-Ear hearing test on the web. there are sixteen real-world samples. Try all sixteen. Cheers On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 00:35:13 GMT, "Diane L. Schirf" – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -<del…@mindspring.com> wrote: >In article <d0ggn0pd3h2ha0bggvvrbeccdrma0ls…@4ax.com>, > Stu-R <st…@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> If your hearing is good, why are you hear? >Because it’s a progressive loss, so when it does get worse, I do want to >have info about hearing aids, cost, care, etc., so I can ask good >questions and so I know what to expect. (I said something like that >orginally in a more abbreviated form, but it got lost in all the >yelling.) I don’t say my hearing is "good"; I have no noticeable >problems at this time.
Response:
In article <Zi%dd.10830$5v2.10…@fe2.columbus.rr.com>, "RK" <x…@xxx.net> wrote: > I don’t have as bad of loss as your audiogram > claims yet odd, I cannot hear 30ft away, even > in a quiet setting,
Neither can I, which is what I said. — http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
In article <6e6hn0dtb364v2b1ffd9hrkn3m0688f…@4ax.com>, Stu-R <st…@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > If you don’t > trust an audiologist
I trust the audiologist I saw. — http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Response:
Well it looks like we’ve "heard" all we need about Diane’s hearing
I wonder if it would be ok if I hi-jack the thread with my audiogram numbers…… Here is my year 2000 base line test done bythe local audiologist: Right Left 250hz 40 35 500hz 45 35 1000hz 40 30 2000hz 35 30 3000hz 25 20 4000hz 10 15 5000hz 20 20 this line could be 6000hz (it’s a fax copy and hard to read) 8000hz 10 30 ENT says it’s hereditary, but there is no history of hearing problems in my family (and it’s abig family), other than those over 60 years of age. Having trouble getting into the audiologist again, so will probably get my next test at work. The HR Training guy just got his cert. for hearing testing, and now we are waiting for the booth to be calibrated (it hasn’t been used for 2 years since the on site nurse retired). Over the last 4 years I have found that it is getting harder and harder to make out conversation, but I have no problem picking up high frequencies. What kind of aids would anyone suggest? I’m leaning towards the DSP programmable kind, especially if I can run the software at home. This way I can adjust them myself, not that I don’t want the audiologist to do it, it’s just, I work out of town and am only in at night and on weekends…..(and I work in computers and am a tech at heart) Is there a particular brand or model that could help me out? I’m quite willing to wear 2 BTE’s (married don’t care what they look like….might even get the black ones, ya I know…geeky…) Dave
Response:
"David McQueen" <mcque…@shawS.ca> wrote in message
news:Tbjed.2425$nl.1688@pd7tw3no… > Well it looks like we’ve "heard" all we need about Diane’s hearing
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ And this was really meant to be funny
The rest was serious though…..thanks Dave
Response:
You have a rising audiogram, a much less common type of loss, this usually related to something genetic or possibly viral. In article <Tbjed.2425$nl.1688@pd7tw3no>, mcque…@shawS.ca says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Well it looks like we’ve "heard" all we need about Diane’s hearing
> I wonder if it would be ok if I hi-jack the thread with my audiogram > numbers…… > Here is my year 2000 base line test done bythe local audiologist: > Right Left > 250hz 40 35 > 500hz 45 35 > 1000hz 40 30 > 2000hz 35 30 > 3000hz 25 20 > 4000hz 10 15 > 5000hz 20 20 this line could be 6000hz (it’s a fax copy and > hard to read) > 8000hz 10 30 > ENT says it’s hereditary, but there is no history of hearing problems in my > family (and it’s abig family), other than those over 60 years of age. > Having trouble getting into the audiologist again, so will probably get my > next test at work. The HR Training guy just got his cert. for hearing > testing, and now we are waiting for the booth to be calibrated (it hasn’t > been used for 2 years since the on site nurse retired). > Over the last 4 years I have found that it is getting harder and harder to > make out conversation, but I have no problem picking up high frequencies. > What kind of aids would anyone suggest? > I’m leaning towards the DSP programmable kind, especially if I can run the > software at home. This way I can adjust them myself, not that I don’t want > the audiologist to do it, it’s just, I work out of town and am only in at > night and on weekends…..(and I work in computers and am a tech at heart) > Is there a particular brand or model that could help me out? I’m quite > willing to wear 2 BTE’s (married don’t care what they look like….might > even get the black ones, ya I know…geeky…) > Dave
Response: