Category: Hearing Loss

Chip

Question:

Mike, I don’t know if you saw this post, so I’m reposting it for you to read. Chip A carcinoma in situ is considered a Stage 0 (zero) colorectal cancer. Thanks for the support, Chip.  If you come across anything you think may be helpful, please send it my way.

Treatment by Stage of Colon Cancer Stage 0: Since your cancer has not grown beyond the inner lining of the colon, surgery to take out the cancer is all that is needed. This may be accomplished in many cases by polypectomy or local excision through the colonoscope. Colon resection may be necessary if your tumor is too big to be removed by local excision. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_4X_Treatment_by_Sta… Copyright 2005

Sudafed, asthma and sinusitis

Question:

"Steven L." <sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message

news:SsQ1f.8483$oc.4131@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> NorthShoreCEO wrote: >> "Steven L." <sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message >> news:GdA1f.7926$zQ3.3126@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net… >>>My advice:  Do the surgery just for the heck of it.  > >>>– >>>Steven D. Litvintchouk >>>Email:  sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net >> I don’t think anyone should ever have surgery "just for the >> heck of it".   It should be the final solution after >> exhausting other options. > That’s where you’re wrong. > Surgery should NOT be the final option for sinusitis, any more > than it is the final option for a malignant tumor.  When you > have a malignant tumor (cancer), surgery is often the > first-line treatment (often followed up by chemotherapy or > radiation). > There have been very few scientific follow-up studies to prove > once and for all what the best treatments for chronic sinusitis > are.  But the only follow-up studies I have seen, show that > surgery has a cure rate of about 80%, while antibiotics and > everything else don’t do anywhere near as well. > Right now, in the medical state of the art, surgery should be > the treatment of choice. > — > Steven D. Litvintchouk > Email:  sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net > Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

So I guess I interpreted Stevens message correctly, Don Brady.

Response:

"Steven L." <sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message

news:SsQ1f.8483$oc.4131@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net… > There have been very few scientific follow-up studies to prove once and > for all what the best treatments for chronic sinusitis are.  But the only > follow-up studies I have seen, show that surgery has a cure rate of about > 80%, while antibiotics and everything else don’t do anywhere near as well. > Right now, in the medical state of the art, surgery should be the > treatment of choice.

I admit to not having seen a lot of studies that give the follow-up info you describe. However, I can tell you that in my experience while it is common for patients to have their symptoms improve, often from intractable to bearable (and treatable with meds), it is rare for a person to go from severe symptoms to no symptoms (or even just mild symptoms) with sinus surgery. I would be curious to know how these studies defined cure. I agree with you that the person should not be long suffering before seeing the surgeon. A fairly aggressive and "prolonged" course of medical therapy can be accomplished fairly quickly (with in 2 or 3 months). I also agree that tests are helpful tools but should not trump treating the patient. — 00doc

Response:

On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 15:59:45 -0500, "NorthShoreCEO" <NorthShore…@aol.com> wrote: >I don’t think anyone should ever have surgery "just for the heck >of it".   It should be the final solution after exhausting other >options.

It was obvious to me that Steven it not mean it literally. He meant "despite your persoanl reservations, since nothing else has worked for you."

Response:

"Don Brady" <dbr…@pobox.com> wrote in message

news:mn8ek1pnrhi85htfb6i88l0o5uig8vhlej@4ax.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 15:59:45 -0500, "NorthShoreCEO" > <NorthShore…@aol.com> > wrote: >>I don’t think anyone should ever have surgery "just for the >>heck >>of it".   It should be the final solution after exhausting >>other >>options. > It was obvious to me that Steven it not mean it literally. > He meant "despite your persoanl reservations, since nothing > else has worked for > you."

Since the loved one of the original poster hasn’t really tried a different number of things to resolve his problem, it isn’t at all obvious to me.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -NorthShoreCEO wrote: > "Steven L." <sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message > news:GdA1f.7926$zQ3.3126@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net… >>My advice:  Do the surgery just for the heck of it.  > >>– >>Steven D. Litvintchouk >>Email:  sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net > I don’t think anyone should ever have surgery "just for the heck > of it".   It should be the final solution after exhausting other > options.

That’s where you’re wrong. Surgery should NOT be the final option for sinusitis, any more than it is the final option for a malignant tumor.  When you have a malignant tumor (cancer), surgery is often the first-line treatment (often followed up by chemotherapy or radiation). There have been very few scientific follow-up studies to prove once and for all what the best treatments for chronic sinusitis are.  But the only follow-up studies I have seen, show that surgery has a cure rate of about 80%, while antibiotics and everything else don’t do anywhere near as well. Right now, in the medical state of the art, surgery should be the treatment of choice. — Steven D. Litvintchouk Email:  sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -NorthShoreCEO wrote: > "Don Brady" <dbr…@pobox.com> wrote in message > news:mn8ek1pnrhi85htfb6i88l0o5uig8vhlej@4ax.com… >>On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 15:59:45 -0500, "NorthShoreCEO" >><NorthShore…@aol.com> >>wrote: >>>I don’t think anyone should ever have surgery "just for the >>>heck >>>of it".   It should be the final solution after exhausting >>>other >>>options. >>It was obvious to me that Steven it not mean it literally. >>He meant "despite your persoanl reservations, since nothing >>else has worked for >>you." > Since the loved one of the original poster hasn’t really tried a > different number of things to resolve his problem, it isn’t at > all obvious to me.

I remember what my ENT said:  "Most patients don’t want to have surgery.   They will try steroids and antibiotics and alternative medicine.  And after they’ve given up, then they come back to me and ask for the surgery." — Steven D. Litvintchouk Email:  sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Lily wrote: > Steven L. wrote: >> Alison Chaiken wrote: >>> Susan <neverm…@nomail.com> writes: >>>> In my case, anything that stops the constant nasal dripping stops me >>>> from having asthma symptoms. >>> I don’t really understand the connection between PND and asthma. >>> Normally mucus goes from the back of your sinuses into your digestive >>> system.  With PND the cilia are weak and the patient is more conscious >>> of mucus in the throat, but it still goes on the normal path into the >>> stomach, right?   >> No. >> Especially at night, PND can drip all the way down thru the trachea, >> right into the bronchial tubes.  If the PND is infected, the infection >> can spread into the bronchial tubes, causing bronchitis and the >> inflammation can trigger asthma. >> I often get acute bronchitis as a consequences of a bad cold or sinus >> infection. >>> Your comments get to the crux of the matter, which is: is the sinus >>> congestion allergy-related or the result of an infection?  He has had >>> a stuffed nose continuously for months except when he’s taken big, >>> continuous Sudafed doses.  Since the nasal discharge is clear and he >>> has no sinus pain, I’m quite doubtful that he has an infection.  The >>> CAT scan shows heavy congestion but no mechanical problems with the >>> septum, etc.  It’s consideration of all these indicators that makes me >>> dubious about the surgery.  Perhaps Susan has hit the nail on the >>> head: we need not a new ENT but an allergist!   >> No, I was in the same boat. >> The CT scan showed no evidence of sinus infection. >> I suffered for years until I found an ENT willing to operate on me >> anyway. And when he did, he found sinus blockages that hadn’t showed >> up on the CT scan. >> CT scans aren’t perfect.  They have a finite resolution and they can >> miss tiny pockets of infection. >> My advice:  Do the surgery just for the heck of it.  Don’t make the >> same mistake I did. > I had a inf in my sinus for over 15 years that *never* showed on a CT > scan. This year I got another inf on the other side, and the CT scan > picked it up! > The dr decided a FESS was the best way to go. While in there, he found > the other inf that I always knew was there. Though I tried and begged > through the years, I was never able to get an ENT willing to operate > without proof that something was up there.

In my case, I finally found an ENT–just one–who still believes that a very detailed patient history and a very detailed list of the patient’s exact symptoms are still the best diagnostic tool, not CT scans.  He disregarded the negative CT scan and agreed to try surgery.  In fact, when I woke up in the Recovery Room after the surgery, he told me that he had my CT scan films in the operating room and while his surgical assistant was telling him the CT scan showed no blockages, he was looking right at the blockages with his endoscope. In fact, right now my ENT is in a disagreement with my allergist!  My allergist did allergy tests on me and they were all negative.  But my ENT says that based on his visual inspection of my turbinates (hypersensitive, hypersecretory, etc.), he is convinced I have allergies.  I told him that my allergy tests were negative.  He retorted, "I don’t care what the allergy tests showed!  You’ve got allergies, Steven!!!" — Steven D. Litvintchouk Email:  sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

Response:

Susan <neverm…@nomail.com> writes: > In my case, anything that stops the constant nasal dripping stops me > from having asthma symptoms.

I don’t really understand the connection between PND and asthma. Normally mucus goes from the back of your sinuses into your digestive system.  With PND the cilia are weak and the patient is more conscious of mucus in the throat, but it still goes on the normal path into the stomach, right?  So how does PND exacerabate asthma?  Does mucus leak into the bronchial tubes or does its slower transit cause a generalized inflammatory response? Susan continues: > Has he considered allergic desensitization?  I had it done > aggressively, complete in 12 weeks, with dramatic sinus and asthma > improvement. Lily writes: >I wonder if your loved one’s asthma is a result of the >sinusitis. This is true in my case. For me, something that helps >clear my sinuses, also clears up the asthma.

NSCEO offers: >Find a new ENT, though, if all his current ENT pointed to was >congestion as a need for surgery.  Did the CAT scan show any >mechanical problems, such as deviated septum, or enlarged turbinates >that would require surgery in order to relieve him of congestion?

Your comments get to the crux of the matter, which is: is the sinus congestion allergy-related or the result of an infection?  He has had a stuffed nose continuously for months except when he’s taken big, continuous Sudafed doses.  Since the nasal discharge is clear and he has no sinus pain, I’m quite doubtful that he has an infection.  The CAT scan shows heavy congestion but no mechanical problems with the septum, etc.  It’s consideration of all these indicators that makes me dubious about the surgery.  Perhaps Susan has hit the nail on the head: we need not a new ENT but an allergist!  I suppose that allergists and ENTs both treat chronic nasopharyngeal problems but you are offered surgery by one and weekly shots by the other. Would sinus irrigation likely be effective in cases of severe allergies?  I suppose it might help remove irritants from the sinuses. NSCEO continues: >If he’s on an antihistamine, like Zyrtec or Allegra, he may want to >ask his doctor if he can try Zyrtec-D or Allegra-D, which has the >decongestant added.

Thanks, that’s an option I wasn’t aware of.  I’ll have a look at drugstore.com. — Alison Chaiken                  "From:" address above is valid. (650) 236-2231 [daytime]        http://www.wsrcc.com/alison/ Predators fail often; prey fail only once. — Tom Evslin

Response:

"Susan" <neverm…@nomail.com> wrote in message

news:3qakmlFe2mrpU1@individual.net… > x-no-archive: yes >> NSCEO continues: >>>If he’s on an antihistamine, like Zyrtec or Allegra, he may >>>want to >>>ask his doctor if he can try Zyrtec-D or Allegra-D, which has >>>the >>>decongestant added.

From Susan: > I don’t advise such preparations unless they also contain an > expectorant.  I take regular Zyrtec and add non drying formula > pseudoephedrine when needed (during colds).  I don’t think the > combination anthistamine/antidecongestants have the non-drying > feature, which is an important one. > Susan

All the -D does is add pseudoephedrine, so taking  Allegra-D and Zyrtec-D is the same as taking Allegra or Zyrtec plus pseudoephedrine.   I’ve been taking the -D seasonally for years and have had no problem.

Response:

Susan <neverm…@nomail.com> writes: > It may help, but in terms of my chronic sinusitis, it wasn’t nearly > effective enough til I got aggressively desensitized.  Any allergist > that tells you you must have weekly shots for a year or more isn’t > going to help, though that’s become the standard convention, based > upon about 26 deaths in 40 years of practice.  I got dramatic > improvement with 12 weeks to desensitize.

Thanks for posting your experience.  What form does "aggressive desensitization" take?  Is it just higher-dose allergy shots?  I got allergy shots for about a dozen years and didn’t find that they did much for me, but I recognize that treatment methods may have improved. NSCEO posted: >>>If he’s on an antihistamine, like Zyrtec or Allegra, he may want to >>>ask his doctor if he can try Zyrtec-D or Allegra-D, which has the >>>decongestant added.

Susan continues: > I don’t advise such preparations unless they also contain an > expectorant.  I take regular Zyrtec and add non drying formula > pseudoephedrine when needed (during colds).  I don’t think the > combination anthistamine/antidecongestants have the non-drying > feature, which is an important one.

How do you tell non-drying decongestants from drying ones? — Alison Chaiken                  "From:" address above is valid. (650) 236-2231 [daytime]        http://www.wsrcc.com/alison/ Predators fail often; prey fail only once. — Tom Evslin

Response:

Alison, I was in a similar situation as you described. I tried a couple of courses of antibiotics over 6-8 months and nothing worked. I was getting progressively worse but I was afraid of the surgery. Over that time, I got two ENT opinions and also visited my allergist for his opinion before agreeing to the surgery. (also had new round of allergy tests which showed new allergies had developed). It is very important to know what kind of surgery they will do. Next I found the doctor with the best reputation in the area. The doctor who performed my surgery showed me exactly on the CAT scan where there were polyps and blockages. He showed me what areas they would open up. I had version of FESS called MIST (at a Boston area hospital) which does not remove turbinates or bone or the mucuous membraines. Once the sinuses were opened I feel about 95% better. I still have some allergy symptoms and irrigate twice daily with the grossan irrigator to keep things healthy. If you are near a major medical center try to go there for an opinion. Not to scare you (just a warning), there are some ENTs still performing an older sinus surgery where they take out too much sinus tissue and the patient can be left with more problems (called empty nose syndrome). Check the FAQ posting for this group. There is a lot of good info on books to read and things to do to help this condition especially irrigating which has been a salvation for me.

Response:

"00doc" <00…@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:m6OdnYYadLFNZqLeRVn-vA@comcast.com… > "NorthShoreCEO" <NorthShore…@aol.com> wrote in message > news:1e2dnXOFOpF5a6LeRVn-gg@comcast.com… >> Sudafed, a decongestant, is probably clearing him of mucous >> that may be causing him to breathe through his mouth, or may >> be creating post nasal drip, which can exacerbate asthma.  If >> he’s on an antihistamine, like Zyrtec or Allegra, he may want >> to ask his doctor if he can try Zyrtec-D or Allegra-D, which >> has the decongestant added. > That would work if he is old enough. The problem is that the > kids have to get to be a good isze before they can take the > 240mg of Sudafed that is in the tabs (I think it is about 12 > years old but always have to look it up).

Hmmmmmm……I assumed she was talking about her partner, her main squeeze, her manly man.  I don’t think Alison has kids, so I think when she writes of her "loved one", it’s her guy.  And let’s hope he’s older than 12. Which means the real advice we want to give her is to let him stand in line for his own drugs!  ;-P

Response:

"Steven L." <sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message

news:GdA1f.7926$zQ3.3126@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net… > My advice:  Do the surgery just for the heck of it.  > > — > Steven D. Litvintchouk > Email:  sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net

I don’t think anyone should ever have surgery "just for the heck of it".   It should be the final solution after exhausting other options.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Steven L. wrote: > Alison Chaiken wrote: >> Susan <neverm…@nomail.com> writes: >>> In my case, anything that stops the constant nasal dripping stops me >>> from having asthma symptoms. >> I don’t really understand the connection between PND and asthma. >> Normally mucus goes from the back of your sinuses into your digestive >> system.  With PND the cilia are weak and the patient is more conscious >> of mucus in the throat, but it still goes on the normal path into the >> stomach, right?   > No. > Especially at night, PND can drip all the way down thru the trachea, > right into the bronchial tubes.  If the PND is infected, the infection > can spread into the bronchial tubes, causing bronchitis and the > inflammation can trigger asthma. > I often get acute bronchitis as a consequences of a bad cold or sinus > infection. >> Your comments get to the crux of the matter, which is: is the sinus >> congestion allergy-related or the result of an infection?  He has had >> a stuffed nose continuously for months except when he’s taken big, >> continuous Sudafed doses.  Since the nasal discharge is clear and he >> has no sinus pain, I’m quite doubtful that he has an infection.  The >> CAT scan shows heavy congestion but no mechanical problems with the >> septum, etc.  It’s consideration of all these indicators that makes me >> dubious about the surgery.  Perhaps Susan has hit the nail on the >> head: we need not a new ENT but an allergist!   > No, I was in the same boat. > The CT scan showed no evidence of sinus infection. > I suffered for years until I found an ENT willing to operate on me > anyway. And when he did, he found sinus blockages that hadn’t showed up > on the CT scan. > CT scans aren’t perfect.  They have a finite resolution and they can > miss tiny pockets of infection. > My advice:  Do the surgery just for the heck of it.  Don’t make the same > mistake I did.

I had a inf in my sinus for over 15 years that *never* showed on a CT scan. This year I got another inf on the other side, and the CT scan picked it up! The dr decided a FESS was the best way to go. While in there, he found the other inf that I always knew was there. Though I tried and begged through the years, I was never able to get an ENT willing to operate without proof that something was up there. I’m not saying I blame the ENTs, or that surgery is the answer for everyone’s problems. I just believe there should be another type of test, or even an "exploratory-type" surgery that could be done in the event a person continues to be sick, but the CT scan is negative. As for asthma, I would wake up gagging from PND and had a chronic asthma cough for months prior to the surgery. A pulmonologist dxd me with asthma about a year ago. The actual day of my surgery it was already better. Now I have very little to no PND , and no cough at all. I’m so grateful! I hope telling my situation will help someone else. Lily

Response:

On 10/2/05 10:06 AM, in article 86psqndf1r….@capsicum.wsrcc.com, "Alison Chaiken" <alison+gnus20051002T093…@dailyplanet.dontspam.wsrcc.com> wrote: > I don’t really understand the connection between PND and asthma. > Normally mucus goes from the back of your sinuses into your digestive > system.  With PND the cilia are weak and the patient is more conscious > of mucus in the throat, but it still goes on the normal path into the > stomach, right?  So how does PND exacerabate asthma?  Does mucus leak > into the bronchial tubes or does its slower transit cause a > generalized inflammatory response?

There is a chapter in Emedicine on sinusitis and asthma. Any product, bug, radioactive tagged bug, appears in trachea form the sinuses in about 16 hours. PND is a common trigger for asthma, but is not the cause of asthma.

Response:

On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:34:17 -0700, Murray Grossan <hydro…@adelphia.net> wrote: >There is a chapter in Emedicine on sinusitis and asthma. >Any product, bug, radioactive tagged bug, appears in trachea form the >sinuses in about 16 hours. PND is a common trigger for asthma, but is not >the cause of asthma.

Would it be correct to say that t he underlying cause of the asthma is probably the same as the underlying cause of the PND and sinusitis – allergic inflammation?

Response:

Alison Chaiken wrote: > Susan <neverm…@nomail.com> writes: >>In my case, anything that stops the constant nasal dripping stops me >>from having asthma symptoms. > I don’t really understand the connection between PND and asthma. > Normally mucus goes from the back of your sinuses into your digestive > system.  With PND the cilia are weak and the patient is more conscious > of mucus in the throat, but it still goes on the normal path into the > stomach, right?  

No. Especially at night, PND can drip all the way down thru the trachea, right into the bronchial tubes.  If the PND is infected, the infection can spread into the bronchial tubes, causing bronchitis and the inflammation can trigger asthma. I often get acute bronchitis as a consequences of a bad cold or sinus infection. > Your comments get to the crux of the matter, which is: is the sinus > congestion allergy-related or the result of an infection?  He has had > a stuffed nose continuously for months except when he’s taken big, > continuous Sudafed doses.  Since the nasal discharge is clear and he > has no sinus pain, I’m quite doubtful that he has an infection.  The > CAT scan shows heavy congestion but no mechanical problems with the > septum, etc.  It’s consideration of all these indicators that makes me > dubious about the surgery.  Perhaps Susan has hit the nail on the > head: we need not a new ENT but an allergist!  

No, I was in the same boat. The CT scan showed no evidence of sinus infection. I suffered for years until I found an ENT willing to operate on me anyway. And when he did, he found sinus blockages that hadn’t showed up on the CT scan. CT scans aren’t perfect.  They have a finite resolution and they can miss tiny pockets of infection. My advice:  Do the surgery just for the heck of it.  Don’t make the same mistake I did. — Steven D. Litvintchouk Email:  sdlit…@earthlinkNOSPAM.net Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

Response:

Recently my loved one’s asthma and sinus congestion has been getting worse.  He tried azithromycin (sp?) for about a month, but it didn’t seem to help.  Perhaps this is not surprising given that his nasal discharge is clear.  A CAT scan showed congestion consistent with his symptoms.  He went to see an ENT who was only interested in doing surgery and refused to perform a sinus culture or endoscopic examination.  Obviously we need a new ENT. Surprisingly the only thing recently that has helped his asthma (or nasal congestion) is Sudafed.  Has anyone heard of sudafed being effective for asthma?  What does the alleviation of the asthma symptoms by Sudafed mean? Of course Sudafed is no longer available from shelves in our area, and I have to wait in line at the prescription counter to purchase it. — Alison Chaiken                  "From:" address above is valid. (650) 236-2231 [daytime]        http://www.wsrcc.com/alison/ Predators fail often; prey fail only once. — Tom Evslin

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Alison Chaiken wrote: > Recently my loved one’s asthma and sinus congestion has been getting > worse.  He tried azithromycin (sp?) for about a month, but it didn’t > seem to help.  Perhaps this is not surprising given that his nasal > discharge is clear.  A CAT scan showed congestion consistent with his > symptoms.  He went to see an ENT who was only interested in doing > surgery and refused to perform a sinus culture or endoscopic > examination.  Obviously we need a new ENT. > Surprisingly the only thing recently that has helped his asthma (or > nasal congestion) is Sudafed.  Has anyone heard of sudafed being > effective for asthma?  What does the alleviation of the asthma > symptoms by Sudafed mean? > Of course Sudafed is no longer available from shelves in our area, and > I have to wait in line at the prescription counter to purchase it.

Hi Alison, I wonder why they jumped on the "surgery" wagon so quickly. Did they say there was blockage that was causing the congestion? If that’s the reason, that may be why they want to do surgery. My sinus was so blocked up that when they tried to do an endoscopic exam, they couldn’t see around many of the blockages. Now, after FESS, they can look all around up there. I wonder if your loved one’s asthma is a result of the sinusitis. This is true in my case. For me, something that helps clear my sinuses, also clears up the asthma. As a matter of fact, before I had the FESS surgery, I was coughing horribly and barely sleeping. The day of the surgery my husband could tell a difference in the cough. Today, 2 months later, I don’t cough at all. Best wishes to you and yours, Lily

Response:

"Alison Chaiken" <alison+gnus20051001T094…@dailyplanet.dontspam.wsrcc.com> wrote in message news:868xxdgoqv.fsf@capsicum.wsrcc.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Recently my loved one’s asthma and sinus congestion has been > getting > worse.  He tried azithromycin (sp?) for about a month, but it > didn’t > seem to help.  Perhaps this is not surprising given that his > nasal > discharge is clear.  A CAT scan showed congestion consistent > with his > symptoms.  He went to see an ENT who was only interested in > doing > surgery and refused to perform a sinus culture or endoscopic > examination.  Obviously we need a new ENT. > Surprisingly the only thing recently that has helped his asthma > (or > nasal congestion) is Sudafed.  Has anyone heard of sudafed > being > effective for asthma?  What does the alleviation of the asthma > symptoms by Sudafed mean? > Of course Sudafed is no longer available from shelves in our > area, and > I have to wait in line at the prescription counter to purchase > it. > — > Alison Chaiken    "From:" address above is valid. > (650) 236-2231 [daytime] http://www.wsrcc.com/alison/ > Predators fail often; prey fail only once. — Tom Evslin

Yes, and you hijacked my thread becaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaauuuuuuuuuuusssssssseee………..??????????????

Response:

On 10/1/05 1:36 PM, in article spC%e.62$9K2…@bignews1.bellsouth.net, – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -"Lily" <smor…@nospambellsouth.net> wrote: > Alison Chaiken wrote: >> Recently my loved one’s asthma and sinus congestion has been getting >> worse.  He tried azithromycin (sp?) for about a month, but it didn’t >> seem to help.  Perhaps this is not surprising given that his nasal >> discharge is clear.  A CAT scan showed congestion consistent with his >> symptoms.  He went to see an ENT who was only interested in doing >> surgery and refused to perform a sinus culture or endoscopic >> examination.  Obviously we need a new ENT. >> Surprisingly the only thing recently that has helped his asthma (or >> nasal congestion) is Sudafed.  Has anyone heard of sudafed being >> effective for asthma?  What does the alleviation of the asthma >> symptoms by Sudafed mean? >> Of course Sudafed is no longer available from shelves in our area, and >> I have to wait in line at the prescription counter to purchase it. > Hi Alison, > I wonder why they jumped on the "surgery" wagon so quickly. Did they say > there was blockage that was causing the congestion? If that’s the > reason, that may be why they want to do surgery. My sinus was so blocked > up that when they tried to do an endoscopic exam, they couldn’t see > around many of the blockages. Now, after FESS, they can look all around > up there. > I wonder if your loved one’s asthma is a result of the sinusitis. This > is true in my case. For me, something that helps clear my sinuses, also > clears up the asthma. As a matter of fact, before I had the FESS > surgery, I was coughing horribly and barely sleeping. The day of the > surgery my husband could tell a difference in the cough. Today, 2 months > later, I don’t cough at all. > Best wishes to you and yours, > Lily

I can understand your concern when the doctor recommends surgery at the first visit. But what is the ethics here? . But understand the ethical dilemma I face every day. For example: I see the child with thick almost solid fluid behind the ear drum. She has a hearing loss. She has already had loads of treatment. I KNOW that the only treatment that will work is to drain the fluid, irrigate the ear at surgery and place a tube. I also know that if I recommend surgery at the first visit the parents will flee. Do I lie and say let’s try this and that  and then if it doesn’t work, we will consider surgery? That way I can "sell " the surgery? Or do I tell the truth and say that surgery is the only thing that will work and have them flee out the door to a more caring doctor? This dilemma comes often and doctors have to choose what they believe is best for the patient.

Response:

"Alison Chaiken" <alison+gnus20051001T094…@dailyplanet.dontspam.wsrcc.com> wrote in message news:868xxdgoqv.fsf@capsicum.wsrcc.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Recently my loved one’s asthma and sinus congestion has been > getting > worse.  He tried azithromycin (sp?) for about a month, but it > didn’t > seem to help.  Perhaps this is not surprising given that his > nasal > discharge is clear.  A CAT scan showed congestion consistent > with his > symptoms.  He went to see an ENT who was only interested in > doing > surgery and refused to perform a sinus culture or endoscopic > examination.  Obviously we need a new ENT. > Surprisingly the only thing recently that has helped his asthma > (or > nasal congestion) is Sudafed.  Has anyone heard of sudafed > being > effective for asthma?  What does the alleviation of the asthma > symptoms by Sudafed mean? > Of course Sudafed is no longer available from shelves in our > area, and > I have to wait in line at the prescription counter to purchase > it. > — > Alison Chaiken    "From:" address above is valid. > (650) 236-2231 [daytime] http://www.wsrcc.com/alison/ > Predators fail often; prey fail only once. — Tom Evslin

Peoples allergies have been really BAD this year – at least in Illinois.  Not sure about where you are. Sudafed, a decongestant, is probably clearing him of mucous that may be causing him to breathe through his mouth, or may be creating post nasal drip, which can exacerbate asthma.  If he’s on an antihistamine, like Zyrtec or Allegra, he may want to ask his doctor if he can try Zyrtec-D or Allegra-D, which has the decongestant added. My ENT has told me more than once, that most sinus infections that appear to be chronic, are merely under-treated, and they require a six week round of antibiotics.  Find a new ENT, though, if all his current ENT pointed to was congestion as a need for surgery.  Did the CAT scan show any mechanical problems, such as deviated septum, or enlarged turbinates that would require surgery in order to relieve him of congestion?  If not, he sounds surgery-happy, and some ENTs are. Can you order Sudafed online, from someplace like www.drugstore.com?  That might be your easiest bet, and it may even be cheaper in the long run.

Response:

"Alison Chaiken" <alison+gnus20051001T094…@dailyplanet.dontspam.wsrcc.com> wrote in message news:868xxdgoqv.fsf@capsicum.wsrcc.com… > Recently my loved one’s asthma and sinus congestion has been getting > worse.  He tried azithromycin (sp?) for about a month, but it didn’t > seem to help.  Perhaps this is not surprising given that his nasal > discharge is clear.  A CAT scan showed congestion consistent with his > symptoms.  He went to see an ENT who was only interested in doing > surgery and refused to perform a sinus culture or endoscopic > examination.  Obviously we need a new ENT.

It is hard to comment on this without knowing more. Sometimes surgery is obviously required (either due to the anatomy or what has previously been tried and failed) and sometimes (contrary to a commonly expressed opinion here) the primary doc actually does do a good job of doing all the non-surgical stuff prior to referring. Of course, a second opinion if there is some doubt is never a bad idea. Endoscopy and culture is warranted if the problem is suspected to be a drug resistant infection. If that is not the case then it will not do much good. Usually prolonged courses of antibiotics are attempted first. If infection is not suspected then antihistamines with decongestants, nasal steorids, and nasal irrigation can help. A referal to an allergist may be helpful. > Surprisingly the only thing recently that has helped his asthma (or > nasal congestion) is Sudafed.  Has anyone heard of sudafed being > effective for asthma?  What does the alleviation of the asthma > symptoms by Sudafed mean?

It is probably being triggered by the sinus congestion and post nasal drip. Trying the above stuff may help. > Of course Sudafed is no longer available from shelves in our area, and > I have to wait in line at the prescription counter to purchase it.

You can thank the meth labs for that. — 00doc

Response:

"Murray Grossan" <hydro…@adelphia.net> wrote in message

news:BF645820.22E4%hydromed@adelphia.net… > Do I lie and say let’s try this and that  and then if it doesn’t work, we > will consider surgery? That way I can "sell " the surgery? > Or do I tell the truth and say that surgery is the only thing that will > work > and have them flee out the door to a more caring doctor? > This dilemma comes often and doctors have to choose what they believe is > best for the patient.

That is the art of medicine. Not only do you have to try to divine the best course but you then need to convince the patient to follow it. Often the second part is harder than the first. Since no treatment plan will work if it is not followed it is also the most important. Whatever has the best chance of getting the patient well is the ethical course. — 00doc

Response:

"NorthShoreCEO" <NorthShore…@aol.com> wrote in message

news:1e2dnXOFOpF5a6LeRVn-gg@comcast.com… > Sudafed, a decongestant, is probably clearing him of mucous that may be > causing him to breathe through his mouth, or may be creating post nasal > drip, which can exacerbate asthma.  If he’s on an antihistamine, like > Zyrtec or Allegra, he may want to ask his doctor if he can try Zyrtec-D or > Allegra-D, which has the decongestant added.

That would work if he is old enough. The problem is that the kids have to get to be a good isze before they can take the 240mg of Sudafed that is in the tabs (I think it is about 12 years old but always have to look it up). > My ENT has told me more than once, that most sinus infections that appear > to be chronic, are merely under-treated, and they require a six week round > of antibiotics.

I think this is definately true. If it is sinusitis then a longer course of a broad spectrum antibiotics can be helpful. The other way it is undertreated is that people don’t hit the medical ways of opening things up hard enough. They either treat allergic congestion as "sinusitis" and then wonder why it keeps relapsing or, even of there is a bacterial component, don’t work hard enough on getting the sinuses draining. Fluid will become infected whenever it sits around where it doesn’t belong (and sinuses that are open will not be infected no matter what bacterial may be present). If you treat the infection but not the drainage you have not really gotten to the root of the problem. > Did the CAT scan show any mechanical problems, such as deviated septum, or > enlarged turbinates that would require surgery in order to relieve him of > congestion?

Those are the relevant questions. Some things just can’t be fixed with drugs. — 00doc

Response:

Any hearing aids optimized for listening to music?

Question:

Woodswun wrote: > Thanks for the info, I’ll look into the DAI.  

Certainly worth it. I added a small level attenuator and it works like a charm: http://www.headphone.com/guide/by-manufacturer/shure/shure-pa235-level- attenuator.php > Not sure that FM wireless would be suitable for me, although I know > nothing about it.

The Sennheiser loop is handy and works well, but of course it is not high end nor even hifi, so it is not for you (all loops cut high end frequency ;) . I like it as a complement to DAI. Holger

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Woodswun wrote: > pellmellwillyni…@hotmail.com wrote: > > Re: feed of earphones into HA’s… > > I noted last year when I wasn’t given any other option than to train > > for a state test on computer, that my HAs’ telecoil setting worked with > > the cheapo earphones I was given for the task. I could leave the BTEs > > on with the earphone right over the ear, and the magnet would pick up > > the sound. Bet higher-end earphones would do that even better. > Thanks for the info.  I’m trying that, but am getting quite a bit of > feedback/loopback in one HA.  :-( > I’ll see if my audiologist thinks she can do anything about that. > Woods

Glunk. I hadn’t thought about the fact that those cheapo earphones didn’t cover my (BTE) hearing aids. Larger, more expensive earphones probably do, and give feedback. The cheapo ones just covered my ears, not my aids as well. The other thing is that with the cheapo earphones, only one side produced sound.

Response:

Ken wrote: > You can eliminate all feedback by using your T-coil. T-coils LOVE > headphones – at least the big ones which cover your ears – not those > microscopic ones they have nowdays. Also, if profoundly deaf, check the > sensitivity – aim for 105 or better.

Somehow, I’m getting feedback using my T-coil.  I’ve tried it with and without any sound being fed into the headphones.  I think I’ll mention it to my audiologist during my next visit, and see if she can do anything about it. Woods

Response:

Ken wrote: > My phonaks – even my first set – accept a DAI shoe – direct audio input > – and enable me to receive feed from any source whichi accepts a > standard plug. For about $1k more you can can gear like microlink > (search the group) where the shoe is a tiny fm receiver and you can > attach the transmitter to any sound source – even a lecturer.

thanks for the info – I’ll have to look into that for my next set (in another 5 years or so). > My hearing is so shot now that I rarely bother with music (except the > masses of it stored in my skull which if can enjoy any time without > wires).

Sorry to hear that. Woods

Response:

pellmellwillyni…@hotmail.com wrote: > Re: feed of earphones into HA’s… > I noted last year when I wasn’t given any other option than to train > for a state test on computer, that my HAs’ telecoil setting worked with > the cheapo earphones I was given for the task. I could leave the BTEs > on with the earphone right over the ear, and the magnet would pick up > the sound. Bet higher-end earphones would do that even better.

Thanks for the info.  I’m trying that, but am getting quite a bit of feedback/loopback in one HA.  :-( I’ll see if my audiologist thinks she can do anything about that. Woods

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Holger Lillqvist wrote: > Woodswun wrote: >>It would be nice if you could recieve wireless feed into your HAs, and >>have it automatically amplified according to your programming.  :-) >>(Or even little wires to plug right into your HAs for a direct feed). > DAI (direct audio input) is the answer… It is an Y shaped chord which > plugs into any audio source, and with shoes which snap on to your HAs. > I started using DAI a few months ago – the sound quality amazed me and > still does. > The DAI wires hanging from your HAs and the need to take off the HAs > to snap the shoes on and off is slighgtly awkward, so I use DAI mostly > for ’serious’ music listening, full length films etc. For ocasional TV > watching and for free style listening outdoors (FM-radio, mp3) I mostly > prefer my Sennheiser neckloop, which gives a nice sound quality for > allround use. > To my surprise the loop, which is part of the Sennheiser FM wireless > system, works very well when plugged to all kinds of sources, without > any battery giving power to the loop. So the battery in the Sennheiser > receiver unit which must be recharged every day is primarily for the FM > receiver, not for the loop. > Holger

Thanks for the info, I’ll look into the DAI.  Not sure that FM wireless would be suitable for me, although I know nothing about it. Woods

Response:

You can eliminate all feedback by using your T-coil. T-coils LOVE headphones – at least the big ones which cover your ears – not those microscopic ones they have nowdays. Also, if profoundly deaf, check the sensitivity – aim for 105 or better.

Response:

Dan wrote: >(snip) Other brands than Oticon for music

Yep. Widex Divas have a music setting I’m very happy with. Since my hearing loss was already in progress when I entered music school, I’m not as picky as my colleagues about high fidelity. Nonetheless, I do know when I’m missing voices, low notes or overtones, and particularly when it’s a piece whose sound I know, it is very painful to listen without all those sounds. Therefore, I think my assessment of the Divas’ program is reasonably reliable. However, I have not used any other music programs on HAs; I have no basis for comparing the Divas’ to any other.

Response:

Woodswun wrote: > It would be nice if you could recieve wireless feed into your HAs, and > have it automatically amplified according to your programming.  :-) > (Or even little wires to plug right into your HAs for a direct feed).

DAI (direct audio input) is the answer… It is an Y shaped chord which plugs into any audio source, and with shoes which snap on to your HAs. I started using DAI a few months ago – the sound quality amazed me and still does. The DAI wires hanging from your HAs and the need to take off the HAs to snap the shoes on and off is slighgtly awkward, so I use DAI mostly for ’serious’ music listening, full length films etc. For ocasional TV watching and for free style listening outdoors (FM-radio, mp3) I mostly prefer my Sennheiser neckloop, which gives a nice sound quality for allround use. To my surprise the loop, which is part of the Sennheiser FM wireless system, works very well when plugged to all kinds of sources, without any battery giving power to the loop. So the battery in the Sennheiser receiver unit which must be recharged every day is primarily for the FM receiver, not for the loop. Holger

Response:

My phonaks – even my first set – accept a DAI shoe – direct audio input – and enable me to receive feed from any source whichi accepts a standard plug. For about $1k more you can can gear like microlink (search the group) where the shoe is a tiny fm receiver and you can attach the transmitter to any sound source – even a lecturer. My hearing is so shot now that I rarely bother with music (except the masses of it stored in my skull which if can enjoy any time without wires).

Response:

Re: feed of earphones into HA’s… I noted last year when I wasn’t given any other option than to train for a state test on computer, that my HAs’ telecoil setting worked with the cheapo earphones I was given for the task. I could leave the BTEs on with the earphone right over the ear, and the magnet would pick up the sound. Bet higher-end earphones would do that even better.

Response:

zaf…@yahoo.com wrote: > Well, there’s probably few things stranger then two HA people > discussing high quality sound reproduction.  My preference is live > music over headphones hands down.  A cheap set of headphones will block > external sounds and give excellent directionality, but I think you will > find few audiophiles that have given up their magneplanars for > headphones.

Really?  Hmmm, both my husband and I much preferred headphones over live performances (he still does, still can hear <g>).  Of course, we don’t get the cheap headphones, and have invested in very high quality soundcards for our computers.  If you’re using cheap equipment, then yeah, I’d be with you on that. > You’re right I missed the comment up front on headphones, but these are > not the definition of high quality sound. The OP was right, modern > instruments (HAs)  are normally tuned for speech which is likely what > is causing his problem.  His best bet is to ignore us both and talk to > his audie about this!

Yup, you’re probably right on that. Woods

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -helco wrote: > <dlhodg…@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1124580360.070017.191520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com… >>I wonder if any of you have ever searched for hearing aids that are >>especially good for listening to music. >>My current aids are Oticon DigiFocus bought in 1997 and they are good, >>but not as good as listening via headphones to stereo.   At concerts >>(classical music usually), I have a dilemma of whether to leave them on >>and hear an over loud sound with excess volume from the highs or to >>take them off and have a more natural beautiful sound at the price of >>losing quieter passages and quieter instruments. >>I gather that the modern hearing aids are optimized for speech and no >>attention has been given to reproducing music well.  I hope some brand >>is good for music. >>Thanks.  Dan > Does your concert hall offer an infrared transmission system?  (Most > theaters and movie houses have them now.)  If so, you can borrow headphones > from them and perhaps the sound will approach the quality that you get with > headphones at home.  The volume is adjustable.  If you have a chance, check > ahead of time to find out where the best seating is, since there can be some > dead spots.  Also, if possible make sure the headphones work before you take > them (learned that the hard way).  I’m looking into some ALD’s that have an > infrared attachment that receives at the same frequency used in most > theaters etc., so you can listen through your own earbuds.  The tone can be > adjusted as well as the volume. > Helen

The only problem with headphones, and the reason I don’t use them as often as I’d like, is that they amplify everything equally, so if you’re   adjusting the volume for, say, high frequencies that you have trouble hearing, you’re getting over-blasted on the lower frequencies (assuming that you don’t have an equal loss across all frequencies). It would be nice if you could recieve wireless feed into your HAs, and have it automatically amplified according to your programming.  :-) (Or even little wires to plug right into your HAs for a direct feed). Woods

Response:

<dlhodg…@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1124580360.070017.191520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com… >I wonder if any of you have ever searched for hearing aids that are > especially good for listening to music. > My current aids are Oticon DigiFocus bought in 1997 and they are good, > but not as good as listening via headphones to stereo.   At concerts > (classical music usually), I have a dilemma of whether to leave them on > and hear an over loud sound with excess volume from the highs or to > take them off and have a more natural beautiful sound at the price of > losing quieter passages and quieter instruments. > I gather that the modern hearing aids are optimized for speech and no > attention has been given to reproducing music well.  I hope some brand > is good for music. > Thanks.  Dan

Does your concert hall offer an infrared transmission system?  (Most theaters and movie houses have them now.)  If so, you can borrow headphones from them and perhaps the sound will approach the quality that you get with headphones at home.  The volume is adjustable.  If you have a chance, check ahead of time to find out where the best seating is, since there can be some dead spots.  Also, if possible make sure the headphones work before you take them (learned that the hard way).  I’m looking into some ALD’s that have an infrared attachment that receives at the same frequency used in most theaters etc., so you can listen through your own earbuds.  The tone can be adjusted as well as the volume. Helen

Response:

I’m currently trialling Bernafon HAs with the ultra-fast "Channelfree" operating system.  Eliminating multiple bands and all but a single channel, these aids introduce significantly less distortion than is produced by conventional digital HAs, and the clarity of both speech and music is quite noticeable… The only adjustment required is to have the comprehensive Oasis software program turn on the aids’ Music program.

Response:

Sorry, Dan, didn’t see your last post before I posted… Both Oticon and Bernafon are sister divisions of the William Demant Holding Group.  They share R&D information, etc.  Oticon tends to distribute its instruments only through audie clinics, etc. Bernafon is currently marketing honestly new designs developed during the past 9 years.  They have also developed a comprehensive and quite complex companion software fitting program (Oasis) that uses leading edge "in situ" procedures… the hearing aids are first fitted to your ears, then connected to the computer program, and you and the fitter can use the detailed graphs on the computer screen to actually adjust and compare various settings, before selecting the best one… The complex computer fitting programs make it possible for any experienced computer user to follow the directions for an unbelievably accurate initial fitting.  So you can get identical results from an audiologist at a private clinic who fits the new aids using this software package, and an certified fitter at a Costco hearing center who fits the new aids using this same software package… Prospective purchasers need to be aware of the price differences for these identical services… kooch

Response:

This is a simplistic post. If you monitor this group you will learn that hearing loss takes a multitude of forms and you cannot compare HAs without relating them to one specific form of loss. Most of the major brands of aids have similar capabilities. What is almost infinitely variable are the forms that hearing loss take. If you find a good audiologist you will find that he/she will be able to program your aids so as to gain for you the maximum ability to hear and enjoy music. But, for instance, if, like me, you have no hearing above 1400 then you will never beable to hear violins, symphony orchestras, whatever because no hearing aid on earth can do the impossible.

Response:

I want to thank you all for your input from various perspectives.  In the time since I wrote my first note I did what I should have done before I wrote–namely, I checked for previous posts on music.  I found a wealth of wisdom and experience.  I gather there’s no clear consensus on a "best" HA for music and that the audiologist can set one or two of the programs to best adapt to music. I was aware that no HA can match good headphones for overall quality, only to differentially adjust for various frequencies.  I must have sounded like I hoped for that.  Sorry. I was just wondering if other brands than Oticon can do music better–and without losing the good things that Oticon does.  I’ve seen Canta 7 and Phonak Perseo suggested.  And so far no one has hinted that the technological pipeline has something coming along that is worth waiting for.  I don’t want to spend $6000-plus and then regret it. I notice that some of you listed your hearing loss at various frequencies in order to help others think about the issues raised.  so I’ll do that. Right ear 500  70db down 1K    75 2K    65 4K    55 6K   60 Left ear 500  55db down 1K    50 2K   55 4K   75 6K   90 Right ear has poor speech discrimination, too.   –Dan

Response:

I wonder if any of you have ever searched for hearing aids that are especially good for listening to music. My current aids are Oticon DigiFocus bought in 1997 and they are good, but not as good as listening via headphones to stereo.   At concerts (classical music usually), I have a dilemma of whether to leave them on and hear an over loud sound with excess volume from the highs or to take them off and have a more natural beautiful sound at the price of losing quieter passages and quieter instruments. I gather that the modern hearing aids are optimized for speech and no attention has been given to reproducing music well.  I hope some brand is good for music. Thanks.  Dan

Response:

dlhodg…@gmail.com said: > I wonder if any of you have ever searched for hearing aids that are > especially good for listening to music. > My current aids are Oticon DigiFocus bought in 1997 and they are good, > but not as good as listening via headphones to stereo.   At concerts > (classical music usually), I have a dilemma of whether to leave them on > and hear an over loud sound with excess volume from the highs or to > take them off and have a more natural beautiful sound at the price of > losing quieter passages and quieter instruments. > I gather that the modern hearing aids are optimized for speech and no > attention has been given to reproducing music well.

I think, for the most part, that’s true. Hearing aids don’t reproduce anything over about 5-6K though some of us (not me :-(  ) still have some hearing at higher frequencies. You might get your audiologist to give you a programme with more compression. This will make the music sound a little less ‘natural’ but the loud passages won’t be amplified as much and so may not sound ‘over loud’ as they do now. Any music with a wide dynamic range is going to be problematical – you need amplification to hear the quiet passages, but the same amount of amplification will make loud passages overly loud, and the more compression or limiting you introduce to to tame the loud passages, the more ‘unnatural’ things sound. > I hope some brand > is good for music.

I don’t think any brand has given music a thought more than any other. The primary aim with hearing aids to to allow people to understand speech, and this is where all the research goes. I’d be interested in what might be possible if some company applied their resources to making the perception of music as natural and enjoyable as possible. Steve  = : ^ )

Response:

dlhodg…@gmail.com wrote: > I wonder if any of you have ever searched for hearing aids that are > especially good for listening to music. > My current aids are Oticon DigiFocus bought in 1997 and they are good, > but not as good as listening via headphones to stereo.   At concerts > (classical music usually), I have a dilemma of whether to leave them on > and hear an over loud sound with excess volume from the highs or to > take them off and have a more natural beautiful sound at the price of > losing quieter passages and quieter instruments.

Live concerts typically do not have the sound quality that is achieved by the use of headphones. > I gather that the modern hearing aids are optimized for speech and no > attention has been given to reproducing music well.  I hope some brand > is good for music.

Possibly, but I think the matter is probably, at least partially, one of a matter of acoustics and control of recordings on CDs.  Concerts just don’t sound as good.  (I recall that from my hearing days, and just asked my other half, who has normal hearing). Woods – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Thanks.  Dan

Response:

>Live concerts typically do not have the sound quality that is achieved by the use of headphones. <

Huh?  Does this mean live concerts will be replaced by people listening to headphones? Try any modern digital programmed with all the noise reduction & speech enhancement off and I think you will find they sound pretty good.  As was previously stated, if you have hearing >8KHz, god bless you, but the instruments will probably be no good up there.

Response:

zaf…@yahoo.com wrote: >>Live concerts typically do not have the sound quality that is achieved by the use of headphones. < > Huh?  Does this mean live concerts will be replaced by people listening > to headphones?

Um …. I’m not sure where you’d assume that.  I was merely pointing out that the sound quality at a live concert typically does not measure up to headphones.  Period. > Try any modern digital programmed with all the noise reduction & speech > enhancement off and I think you will find they sound pretty good.  As > was previously stated, if you have hearing >8KHz, god bless you, but > the instruments will probably be no good up there.

I believe you’ve missed the entire point of my post.  Of course a concert can sound "good" with hearing aids, but the original poster was expecting the same excellent quality that you get with headphones, which not even normal hearing people experience at live concerts.  Just pointing that out, is all.  Sorry if it touched some kind of nerve. Woods

Response:

Well, there’s probably few things stranger then two HA people discussing high quality sound reproduction.  My preference is live music over headphones hands down.  A cheap set of headphones will block external sounds and give excellent directionality, but I think you will find few audiophiles that have given up their magneplanars for headphones. You’re right I missed the comment up front on headphones, but these are not the definition of high quality sound. The OP was right, modern instruments (HAs)  are normally tuned for speech which is likely what is causing his problem.  His best bet is to ignore us both and talk to his audie about this!

Response:

Many modern digital aids to have a "music" program which provides frequency correction but switches off noise reduction and other sound processing necessary for increased speech intelligibility and allows the maximumum frequency range that the aids are capable of (i.e. up to about 6k). I use Phonak Perseos but I expect many other good quality makes have similar programs. I certainly find my experience of live music is enhanced by my hearing aids. I can even hear the piccolos, triangles and cymbals again! You might need to upgrade yor hearing aids but make sure you try listening to live music during the trial period. Archie <dlhodg…@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1124580360.070017.191520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I wonder if any of you have ever searched for hearing aids that are > especially good for listening to music. > My current aids are Oticon DigiFocus bought in 1997 and they are good, > but not as good as listening via headphones to stereo.   At concerts > (classical music usually), I have a dilemma of whether to leave them on > and hear an over loud sound with excess volume from the highs or to > take them off and have a more natural beautiful sound at the price of > losing quieter passages and quieter instruments. > I gather that the modern hearing aids are optimized for speech and no > attention has been given to reproducing music well.  I hope some brand > is good for music. > Thanks.  Dan

Response:

Guilty Conscious anxiety

Question:

Neurochemistry events happen on (I want to say it’s the post-synaptic effort, but can’t recall right this minute, and don’t feel like looking it up – not to mention that it doesn’t matter here anyway…) one part of the neuron that make Remeron very rapidly an anti-anxiety drug for many people, but in the long haul, it’s "classified" as an anti-depressant. Given that guilt is often a feature of depression, I’m thinking a visit to the dr’s office might be of great use to this person.

She’s currently on only 15 mg so maybe if I double the dosage….. What do u think ? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – G Dear Group, Is there such a thing as a mental illness or anxiety disorder where a person is always feeling quite intensely guilty about things they never used to worry about. Examples of guilty thoughts are eating meat, animal testing, driving a car ( air pollution ) fearing God, playing Grand Theft Auto or similar games, playing music while feeling guilty about the bands that suffer hearing loss, always feeling guilty if not convinced doing the right thing even if legal, etc etc, ……even feeling guilty watching movies at the cinema because thoughts of make-up the actors are wearing are tested on animals or upgrading software, though she is happy with current version or she feels guilty. This person who feels guilty about these things is taking Remeron ( AKA-avanza ) which she thinks may be intensifying paranoid thoughts. I did my research though and the drug is meant to help fight anxiety. Thanks for any replies.

Response:

I think an MD should be making and monitoring all adjustments in any of her medications, and no one else. G

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Neurochemistry events happen on (I want to say it’s the post-synaptic effort, but can’t recall right this minute, and don’t feel like looking it up – not to mention that it doesn’t matter here anyway…) one part of the neuron that make Remeron very rapidly an anti-anxiety drug for many people, but in the long haul, it’s "classified" as an anti-depressant. Given that guilt is often a feature of depression, I’m thinking a visit to the dr’s office might be of great use to this person. She’s currently on only 15 mg so maybe if I double the dosage….. What do u think ? G Dear Group, Is there such a thing as a mental illness or anxiety disorder where a person is always feeling quite intensely guilty about things they never used to worry about. Examples of guilty thoughts are eating meat, animal testing, driving a car ( air pollution ) fearing God, playing Grand Theft Auto or similar games, playing music while feeling guilty about the bands that suffer hearing loss, always feeling guilty if not convinced doing the right thing even if legal, etc etc, ……even feeling guilty watching movies at the cinema because thoughts of make-up the actors are wearing are tested on animals or upgrading software, though she is happy with current version or she feels guilty. This person who feels guilty about these things is taking Remeron ( AKA-avanza ) which she thinks may be intensifying paranoid thoughts. I did my research though and the drug is meant to help fight anxiety. Thanks for any replies.

Response:

I think an MD should be making and monitoring all adjustments in any of her medications, and no one else.

translation:  PHILIP?  NO RESPONSES FROM YOU, BOY !  there.  that took care’ah that !  hmmph ~tanya <smile

Response:

I think an MD should be making and monitoring all adjustments in any of her medications, and no one else. translation:  PHILIP?  NO RESPONSES FROM YOU, BOY !  there.  that took care’ah that !  hmmph ~tanya <smile

I think an MD should be making and monitoring all adjustments in any of her medications, and no one else. Philip – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

Dear Group, Is there such a thing as a mental illness or anxiety disorder where a person is always feeling quite intensely guilty about things they never used to worry about. Examples of guilty thoughts are eating meat, animal testing, driving a car ( air pollution ) fearing God, playing Grand Theft Auto or similar games, playing music while feeling guilty about the bands that suffer hearing loss, always feeling guilty if not convinced doing the right thing even if legal, etc etc, ……even feeling guilty watching movies at the cinema because thoughts of make-up the actors are wearing are tested on animals or upgrading software, though she is happy with current version or she feels guilty. This person who feels guilty about these things is taking Remeron ( AKA-avanza ) which she thinks may be intensifying paranoid thoughts. I did my research though and the drug is meant to help fight anxiety. Thanks for any replies.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Dear Group, Is there such a thing as a mental illness or anxiety disorder where a person is always feeling quite intensely guilty about things they never used to worry about. Examples of guilty thoughts are eating meat, animal testing, driving a car ( air pollution ) fearing God, playing Grand Theft Auto or similar games, playing music while feeling guilty about the bands that suffer hearing loss, always feeling guilty if not convinced doing the right thing even if legal, etc etc, ……even feeling guilty watching movies at the cinema because thoughts of make-up the actors are wearing are tested on animals or upgrading software, though she is happy with current version or she feels guilty. This person who feels guilty about these things is taking Remeron ( AKA-avanza ) which she thinks may be intensifying paranoid thoughts. I did my research though and the drug is meant to help fight anxiety.

i’m thinkin’ she should move to tha rain forest’n become a vegan. BYOB (bring yer own broccoli)…’n don’t ferget that rememon !!!! ~tanya

Response:

Neurochemistry events happen on (I want to say it’s the post-synaptic effort, but can’t recall right this minute, and don’t feel like looking it up – not to mention that it doesn’t matter here anyway…) one part of the neuron that make Remeron very rapidly an anti-anxiety drug for many people, but in the long haul, it’s "classified" as an anti-depressant. Given that guilt is often a feature of depression, I’m thinking a visit to the dr’s office might be of great use to this person. G

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Dear Group, Is there such a thing as a mental illness or anxiety disorder where a person is always feeling quite intensely guilty about things they never used to worry about. Examples of guilty thoughts are eating meat, animal testing, driving a car ( air pollution ) fearing God, playing Grand Theft Auto or similar games, playing music while feeling guilty about the bands that suffer hearing loss, always feeling guilty if not convinced doing the right thing even if legal, etc etc, ……even feeling guilty watching movies at the cinema because thoughts of make-up the actors are wearing are tested on animals or upgrading software, though she is happy with current version or she feels guilty. This person who feels guilty about these things is taking Remeron ( AKA-avanza ) which she thinks may be intensifying paranoid thoughts. I did my research though and the drug is meant to help fight anxiety. Thanks for any replies.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Dear Group, Is there such a thing as a mental illness or anxiety disorder where a person is always feeling quite intensely guilty about things they never used to worry about. Examples of guilty thoughts are eating meat, animal testing, driving a car ( air pollution ) fearing God, playing Grand Theft Auto or similar games, playing music while feeling guilty about the bands that suffer hearing loss, always feeling guilty if not convinced doing the right thing even if legal, etc etc, ……even feeling guilty watching movies at the cinema because thoughts of make-up the actors are wearing are tested on animals or upgrading software, though she is happy with current version or she feels guilty. This person who feels guilty about these things is taking Remeron ( AKA-avanza ) which she thinks may be intensifying paranoid thoughts. I did my research though and the drug is meant to help fight anxiety. i’m thinkin’ she should move to tha rain forest’n become a vegan. BYOB (bring yer own broccoli)…’n don’t ferget that rememon !!!!

If she becomes a vegan, I’ll be forced to leave her. Us carnivores don’t like hippies ! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – ~tanya

Response:

Acute Disappointment with National Hearing Aid Dispenser

Question:

Bear in mind that most of the $3000 to $5000 pays for the services of the specialist who diagnoses the problem, selects a suitable aid, configures it and follows up. While I feel the number of contact hours quoted for audiologists (with my third set of aids and two good audies I doubt I would have reached 5 hours total) if you compare what you would pay for the services of any other specialist the cost is not excessive. On the question of whether you can afford it, I would say, again from my own experience, that, if you are profoundly deaf a soundly-fitted hearing aid will, simply, change your life. Most people can afford a car which costs many times as much (and will, hardly, alter your life). So most people can afford a hearing aid. For those who cannot afford a car and, maybe, find it difficult to afford a roof over their heads or food for their families then the story may be different. In Australia and the UK the Government makes some provision for such people. But for the great bulk of populations in affluent societies affordability is not a problem. Ignorance on the part of those who need help is. And distortions in the industry (which makes you think you are paying for a hearing aid when you are, really, paying mainly for medical services) do not help. Nor does advertising which engenders unrealistic expectations as to what HAs can do. As I say, they can change your life but restoration of hearing is only partial and it requires hard work and application to realise the potential benefits. This idea of going to a dispenser and coming out with 20/20 hearing is drivel.

Response:

No. What your a saying is that, amongst the uses you see for your income, $3,000 for hearing aids is too much. You obviously have a computer and probably have at least one car and a home and all sorts of other hardware and, no doubt, you spend a considerable amount on various sorts of services. You are not asserting that HAs cost too much. You are, simply, describing your personal preferences as a consumer. Consider for a moment the possibility that you are wrong – that you and your family might benefit immeasurably if a member with severe hearing loss had  $3k or $5k spent on hearing aids rather than on a boat or a new lawn. Or on some other relatively trivial and transitory personal or family  ’improvement’.

Response:

See: http://hohadvocates.org/wwwboard/view.php?bn=hohadvocates_hohconcerns…

Response:

On 7 Aug 2005 05:19:52 -0700, ni…@pnc.com.au wrote: >…. > They are a good fit however and in comparision to my old aids not too >bad at all.  Yes because they are a good aid I don’t want to take them >back. regards Judy

You can get the same aids elsewhere.  The most important part of the aid is the person who adjusts them. Mike

Response:

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:01:59 GMT, Diane <del…@nospamatmindspring.com> wrote: >In article <1123464675.601479.34…@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > "Ken" <kkerri…@ozemail.com.au> wrote: >>    1. >>       They are sold in relatively low volume (i.e. approximately 1.7 >> million hearing aids for some 30 million hearing impaired) are sold per >> year, as compared to several million stereos. >Maybe more hearing impaired would buy them if they didn’t cost so much!

And more aids would be sitting in a drawer.  Designing and fitting an aid are not simple things if you want results. Mike

Response:

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:04:10 GMT, Diane <del…@nospamatmindspring.com> wrote: >In article <1123464675.601479.34…@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > "Ken" <kkerri…@ozemail.com.au> wrote: >>    3. >>       The amount of time spent by an audiologist with a patient is very >> significant. Data indicate that an average of five direct contact hours >> is spent during the first year a patient receives hearing aids. >"Very significant" compared to what?

Compared to what you pay and the time you spend when you visit your doctor. Mike

Response:

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:33:30 GMT, Diane <del…@nospamatmindspring.com> wrote: >> And more aids would be sitting in a drawer.  Designing and fitting an >> aid are not simple things if you want results. >I understand that, although I think it’s somewhat inflated (compared to >other specialists).

You mean like contact lenses and drugs?  Last time I checked the price of a Flovent inhaler it was $137 and lasts for about a month. >The point is still that every time someone quotes >how so many need hearing aids who don’t have them (the ratio here is >about 15:1), they have to realise that most simply can’t afford them. A >stereo costs a few hundred dollars, more if really high end.

Same price as an inexpensive hearing aid, yet many of those people who can’t afford hearing aids will have stereos.  A high end sound system can easily cost tens of thousands of dollars and sometimes above $100,000. >But 30 million people may not be able to cough up thousands of dollars. It’s >apples to oranges.

They don’t need to spend thousands of dollars.  An inexpensive aid properly fit can still be very effective. I think in most situations it is a case of priorities. Mike

Response:

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:54:31 -0700, G. M. Alf – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -<totalhear…@comcast.net> wrote: >On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:33:30 GMT, Diane ><del…@nospamatmindspring.com> wrote: >>> And more aids would be sitting in a drawer.  Designing and fitting an >>> aid are not simple things if you want results. >>I understand that, although I think it’s somewhat inflated (compared to >>other specialists). >You mean like contact lenses and drugs?  Last time I checked the price >of a Flovent inhaler it was $137 and lasts for about a month. >>The point is still that every time someone quotes >>how so many need hearing aids who don’t have them (the ratio here is >>about 15:1), they have to realise that most simply can’t afford them. A >>stereo costs a few hundred dollars, more if really high end. >Same price as an inexpensive hearing aid, yet many of those people who >can’t afford hearing aids will have stereos.  A high end sound system >can easily cost tens of thousands of dollars and sometimes above >$100,000.

 $100,000 for a sound system?    I’m afraid you have just lost all credibility in my opinion. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>But 30 million people may not be able to cough up thousands of dollars. It’s >>apples to oranges. >They don’t need to spend thousands of dollars.  An inexpensive aid >properly fit can still be very effective. >I think in most situations it is a case of priorities. >Mike

Response:

This extract from a link recently listed by Steve may be of interest: Why do hearing aids cost so much? The reasons hearing aids cost so much are:    1.       They are sold in relatively low volume (i.e. approximately 1.7 million hearing aids for some 30 million hearing impaired) are sold per year, as compared to several million stereos.    2.       The amount of time and money spent by manufacturers on research and development is considerable. One manufacturer claims to have spent over twenty million dollars developing a single model.    3.       The amount of time spent by an audiologist with a patient is very significant. Data indicate that an average of five direct contact hours is spent during the first year a patient receives hearing aids. This time is critical for new users, particularly to assist during the acclimatization process. Mail order or budget clubs can afford to sell hearing aids at lower prices because the electronic components often are inexpensive and the hearing aids themselves are often placed on the user with minimal (or in the case of mail order) no instructions or fine tuning adjustments. Furthermore, the patient may be charged for every return visit, including minor tubing change and adjustments. Thus, in the long run the patient is likely to pay as much or even more. Additionally, the minimum amount of training required for a dispensing audiologist is a Masters degree while mail order or discount centers are often staffed by sales people having minimal technical training. Audiologists, like consumers, are concerned about keeping the cost of hearing aids affordable. The reality is, communication is one of the most important skills humans have. So if wearing hearing aids allows you to resume normal activities and communicate with loved ones, the cost becomes a lot more justifiable. I have already expressed scepticism about the ‘five contact hours’ for a first aid. I am into my third and I woul not yet have totted up five contact hours. But it is, or should be, a time-consujming business. If it is not t hen you are not being looked after properly.

Response:

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:32:32 GMT, Diane <del…@nospamatmindspring.com> wrote: >I’d like to see the average person buy that. This is really straying >from the point, isn’t it? It’s not about stereos. It’s about the >constantly quoted statistic that so many people who need hearing aids >don’t get them, and I’m sure cost is a factor for many. A lot of people >just don’t have $3,000+ to spare.

The average person couldn’t afford $65? The first point is that not all hearing aids cost $3000+ just as not all stereos cost a quarter million $. The second point is that hardware is only part of the cost. Most people don’t get hearing aids because they don’t want them. Mike

Response:

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:00:25 GMT, Diane <del…@nospamatmindspring.com> wrote: >In article <kavmf1holnfebh735eqvshgs198pqph…@4ax.com>, > G. M. Alf <totalhear…@comcast.net> wrote: >> They don’t need to spend thousands of dollars.  An inexpensive aid >> properly fit can still be very effective. >I dunno. I don’t see too many hearing aids selling for $350 (what I paid >for my stereo).

Here’s a pair: http://www.healthandfitnessnews.com/HearingProblems.html Digital canal aids for $64.95/pair. I’d like to see a pair of high end hearing aids that come anywhere close to the $230,980.00 price of the 2 channel Goldmund CD player system in the other message I posted. Mike

Response:

And that’s only mono.

Response:

As a former audiophile I can tell you that all of my expensive equipment is worthless to me. As well as my large CD & LP collection.  Yes you can spend $100,000 on a sound system, but to me at this time it would not sound better than a $1,000 system. My $3,000 GN Resounds are worth every penny.  The key is a good hearing aid and a GREAT audiologist.  Great audiologists are difficult to find, but it is worth the effort and expense.  People on this newsgroup complain about the price of HE’s which usually includes a good deal of service.  It is the service that makes the difference.  My audiologist will spend whatever time is necessary for me to be satisfied with my HE’s, of course I expect to pay for the service of a top professional, as I would for my doctors, lawyer and accountant.  My audiologist works exclusively with a Neurotologist practice and is on a Cochlear Implant Team. Michael Cogan’s Syndrome Profound Hearing Loss Left Ear Moderate Hearing Loss Right Ear Complete Vestibular Dysfunction Severely Intrusive Tinnitus "Diane" <del…@nospamatmindspring.com> wrote in message

news:delenn-B094CE.20002611082005@news1.east.earthlink.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <kavmf1holnfebh735eqvshgs198pqph…@4ax.com>, > G. M. Alf <totalhear…@comcast.net> wrote: >> They don’t need to spend thousands of dollars.  An inexpensive aid >> properly fit can still be very effective. > I dunno. I don’t see too many hearing aids selling for $350 (what I paid > for my stereo). > — > Web site: http://www.slywy.com/ > Message board: http://www.slywy.com/phpBB2/ > Journal: http://slywy.diaryland.com/

Response:

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:49:04 -0500, JimL <m…@privacy.net> wrote: > $100,000 for a sound system?   > I’m afraid you have just lost all credibility in my opinion.

You’ve really got to shop somewhere other than Walmart.  Since I am such a great guy I did some shopping for you: Lets start with a Goldmund Eidos 38D CD/DVD player, a drop in the bucket at $24,090.00. Next, a Mimesis 20M Millennium D/A converter for connecting those extra devices we wont add on at the moment; $37,400.00. We should also will need a Mimesis 22M analog preamp; $37,400.00 + $3,950.00 for the digital input option. We are going to skimp a bit here and go for the Mimesis 29M stereo power amp, 500W/channel;  $20,350.00 + $2,190.00 for the digital input option. Lets see what we are up to so far: $125,380.00 Not too bad but we still need speakers. We’ll go for the Epilogue speaker system.  There are three sections to the system: Epilogue 1 Satellite System, handles the high end, $24,200.00/pair. Epilogue 2 Bass Speaker, handles the middle section of the system: $39,600.00/2 pair. Epilogue 3 Subwoofer System, with built in 500 W amp and active crossover; $41,800.00. This comes to a total of $230,980.00 for what is basically a 2 channel CD player.  We can still add a tuner and other such components. How does that compare to high end hearing aid prices? http://www.goldmundusa.com/productultimateline2.html You were saying something about credibility? Mike

Response:

Re: Changing fitters in midstream. Many have done that but of course the way this sweetheart industry is configured you will have already prepaid a few thousand for services that you must write off to "experience." In addition many (not all) have found that busy fitters who didn’t make the big bucks from the sale will sometimes turn down requests for service only (or don’t give their best service). It should be clear to us by now that retailers make lousy audiologists and audiologists are lousy choices as retailers. In my view unbundling hardware from services would improve the industry greatly. You should be able to pay out as much of that $2000 for services as you want and need and you should be able to select who pay it to at any point in the process. If this were done poor fitters would fail and good fitters would prosper. Of course you will find this prospect terrifies poor fitters.

Response:

If you can locate a good audiologist and put the problem to him there is a reasonable chance that you can work something out. But you should expect to pay on a time basis – at a similar rate to what a lawyer might charge. And, considering what is at stake, I can assure you that it is money well spent.

Response:

Yeah, I know it would cost $$>  I wasn’t thinking of having the new Audi provide services the other audi was supposed to provide. I guess the best approach would be to pester the bad audi until you are sure he lost money on you case and then try to find a good Audi. That way you can at least consider that you’ve "punished the bad Audi. Would that be considered a lose-lose situation ;-) On 5 Aug 2005 08:49:46 -0700, errat…@yahoo.com wrote: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Re: Changing fitters in midstream. >Many have done that but of course the way this sweetheart industry is >configured you will have already prepaid a few thousand for services >that you must write off to "experience." >In addition many (not all) have found that busy fitters who didn’t make >the big bucks from the sale will sometimes turn down requests for >service only (or don’t give their best service). >It should be clear to us by now that retailers make lousy audiologists >and audiologists are lousy choices as retailers. In my view unbundling >hardware from services would improve the industry greatly. >You should be able to pay out as much of that $2000 for services as you >want and need and you should be able to select who pay it to at any >point in the process. If this were done poor fitters would fail and >good fitters would prosper. >Of course you will find this prospect terrifies poor fitters.

Response:

On 4 Aug 2005 05:09:21 -0700, ni…@pnc.com.au wrote: >Hi recently had two new hearing aids fitted (Oticon Tego for which I >paid $5250……

Can you not return the aids and go elsewhere? Mike

Response:

The aids themselves are quite good – I had to bring my own radio and pressure the audi to let me use it as a reference whereas he should have supplied this I believe.  He only channel that I have is working quite well.  I should have another channel but this is not working – I will have to go back.  What I am mad about is his sheer laziness in not trying to give me the optimum chance of hearing at my best.  If he thinks his voice is the best reference he is totally wrong because he speaks so loudly. I don’t get a chance to test soft sounds or different tones of sounds.  I still don’t know if they are working at their best.  They are a good fit however and in comparision to my old aids not too bad at all.  Yes because they are a good aid I don’t want to take them back. regards Judy

Response:

Return the hearing aids during the trial period. Most states have a mandatory trial period for hearing aid in which you can return the HE’s and get a refund for all except a reasonable service fee. You should have been informed about the trial period when you ordered your HE’s.  My audiologist gave me a booklet concerning the trial period. For information contact your Attorney General Office. <ni…@pnc.com.au> wrote in message

news:1123157361.921750.214520@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi recently had two new hearing aids fitted (Oticon Tego for which I > paid $5250.  The first fitting I was asked to listen to the dispenser’s > quite loud and sonorous voice to judge whether the aids were working > correctly.  Because I could hear his voice quite clearly (I could hear > it clearly without the aid) I thought the aids were working correctly. > When I got home I found that I had to turn the TV up a lot louder than > I normally do with an aid.  I put in my old aids and found I could hear > a lot clearer with them than the new ones.  I took them back two weeks > later and he sent them off the the factory to have them checked out and > a volume control put on.  When I returned to pick them up I took with > me a small radio to listen to. I told him that I felt it was not good > that he did not have any noise reference for me to listen to. I told > him that listening to his voice was not helpful to me as I needed soft > noises as a reference.  He made an excuse that he used to have a radio > but no longer had one.  Using the small radio that I brought in, and my > old aids I was able to tell him how loud to set the volume.  In actual > fact the aids are good but again he failed to fix the second setting > which is supposed to be good for narrowing directionality in noise.  I > only discovered this when I got home.  I felt he pushed me into a 15 > minute appointment without giving me the time to make sure that all the > settings were working correctly.  The telicoil is not working either. > I will have to make another appointment to get this fixed.  I wonder do > other people have this problem that the dispenser does not give any > sound reference apart from their voice?? In the case of a man with a > loud clear voice is is very hard to work out if the aids will pick up > soft sounds.  I felt very annoyed about this.   is .  One good thing > the fitting was excellent – they fit perfectly.

Response:

Hi recently had two new hearing aids fitted (Oticon Tego for which I paid $5250.  The first fitting I was asked to listen to the dispenser’s quite loud and sonorous voice to judge whether the aids were working correctly.  Because I could hear his voice quite clearly (I could hear it clearly without the aid) I thought the aids were working correctly. When I got home I found that I had to turn the TV up a lot louder than I normally do with an aid.  I put in my old aids and found I could hear a lot clearer with them than the new ones.  I took them back two weeks later and he sent them off the the factory to have them checked out and a volume control put on.  When I returned to pick them up I took with me a small radio to listen to. I told him that I felt it was not good that he did not have any noise reference for me to listen to. I told him that listening to his voice was not helpful to me as I needed soft noises as a reference.  He made an excuse that he used to have a radio but no longer had one.  Using the small radio that I brought in, and my old aids I was able to tell him how loud to set the volume.  In actual fact the aids are good but again he failed to fix the second setting which is supposed to be good for narrowing directionality in noise.  I only discovered this when I got home.  I felt he pushed me into a 15 minute appointment without giving me the time to make sure that all the settings were working correctly.  The telicoil is not working either. I will have to make another appointment to get this fixed.  I wonder do other people have this problem that the dispenser does not give any sound reference apart from their voice?? In the case of a man with a loud clear voice is is very hard to work out if the aids will pick up soft sounds.  I felt very annoyed about this.   is .  One good thing the fitting was excellent – they fit perfectly.

Response:

I would also be disappointed with such treatment.  My dispenser sets aside about an hour.  We talk, watch TV and walk around outside as part of the check out.  You may wish to find someone else. Bill <ni…@pnc.com.au> wrote in message

news:1123157361.921750.214520@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi recently had two new hearing aids fitted (Oticon Tego for which I > paid $5250.  The first fitting I was asked to listen to the dispenser’s > quite loud and sonorous voice to judge whether the aids were working > correctly.  Because I could hear his voice quite clearly (I could hear > it clearly without the aid) I thought the aids were working correctly. > When I got home I found that I had to turn the TV up a lot louder than > I normally do with an aid.  I put in my old aids and found I could hear > a lot clearer with them than the new ones.  I took them back two weeks > later and he sent them off the the factory to have them checked out and > a volume control put on.  When I returned to pick them up I took with > me a small radio to listen to. I told him that I felt it was not good > that he did not have any noise reference for me to listen to. I told > him that listening to his voice was not helpful to me as I needed soft > noises as a reference.  He made an excuse that he used to have a radio > but no longer had one.  Using the small radio that I brought in, and my > old aids I was able to tell him how loud to set the volume.  In actual > fact the aids are good but again he failed to fix the second setting > which is supposed to be good for narrowing directionality in noise.  I > only discovered this when I got home.  I felt he pushed me into a 15 > minute appointment without giving me the time to make sure that all the > settings were working correctly.  The telicoil is not working either. > I will have to make another appointment to get this fixed.  I wonder do > other people have this problem that the dispenser does not give any > sound reference apart from their voice?? In the case of a man with a > loud clear voice is is very hard to work out if the aids will pick up > soft sounds.  I felt very annoyed about this.   is .  One good thing > the fitting was excellent – they fit perfectly.

Response:

This problem poses a question I’ve had in the past but was afraid to ask: If I get a hearing aid from a dispenser and I find I don’t like the results and I don’t like the dispenser, can’t I go to an audiologist who deals with that particular brand and get re-fitted or get it tuned properly?  I understand one has to pay for such services, but it’s better than throwing a $5,000 set of aids in the drawer, never to be seen again.  If they are BTEs it would be even easier, I would think. On 4 Aug 2005 05:09:21 -0700, ni…@pnc.com.au wrote: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hi recently had two new hearing aids fitted (Oticon Tego for which I >paid $5250.  The first fitting I was asked to listen to the dispenser’s >quite loud and sonorous voice to judge whether the aids were working >correctly.  Because I could hear his voice quite clearly (I could hear >it clearly without the aid) I thought the aids were working correctly. >When I got home I found that I had to turn the TV up a lot louder than >I normally do with an aid.  I put in my old aids and found I could hear >a lot clearer with them than the new ones.  I took them back two weeks >later and he sent them off the the factory to have them checked out and >a volume control put on.  When I returned to pick them up I took with >me a small radio to listen to. I told him that I felt it was not good >that he did not have any noise reference for me to listen to. I told >him that listening to his voice was not helpful to me as I needed soft >noises as a reference.  He made an excuse that he used to have a radio >but no longer had one.  Using the small radio that I brought in, and my >old aids I was able to tell him how loud to set the volume.  In actual >fact the aids are good but again he failed to fix the second setting >which is supposed to be good for narrowing directionality in noise.  I >only discovered this when I got home.  I felt he pushed me into a 15 >minute appointment without giving me the time to make sure that all the >settings were working correctly.  The telicoil is not working either. >I will have to make another appointment to get this fixed.  I wonder do >other people have this problem that the dispenser does not give any >sound reference apart from their voice?? In the case of a man with a >loud clear voice is is very hard to work out if the aids will pick up >soft sounds.  I felt very annoyed about this.   is .  One good thing >the fitting was excellent – they fit perfectly.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:09:21 UTC, ni…@pnc.com.au wrote: > Hi recently had two new hearing aids fitted (Oticon Tego for which I > paid $5250.  The first fitting I was asked to listen to the dispenser’s > quite loud and sonorous voice to judge whether the aids were working > correctly.  Because I could hear his voice quite clearly (I could hear > it clearly without the aid) I thought the aids were working correctly. > When I got home I found that I had to turn the TV up a lot louder than > I normally do with an aid.  I put in my old aids and found I could hear > a lot clearer with them than the new ones.  I took them back two weeks > later and he sent them off the the factory to have them checked out and > a volume control put on.  When I returned to pick them up I took with > me a small radio to listen to. I told him that I felt it was not good > that he did not have any noise reference for me to listen to. I told > him that listening to his voice was not helpful to me as I needed soft > noises as a reference.  He made an excuse that he used to have a radio > but no longer had one.  Using the small radio that I brought in, and my > old aids I was able to tell him how loud to set the volume.  In actual > fact the aids are good but again he failed to fix the second setting > which is supposed to be good for narrowing directionality in noise.  I > only discovered this when I got home.  I felt he pushed me into a 15 > minute appointment without giving me the time to make sure that all the > settings were working correctly.  The telicoil is not working either. > I will have to make another appointment to get this fixed.  I wonder do > other people have this problem that the dispenser does not give any > sound reference apart from their voice?? In the case of a man with a > loud clear voice is is very hard to work out if the aids will pick up > soft sounds.  I felt very annoyed about this.   is .  One good thing > the fitting was excellent – they fit perfectly.

  Hello,   Scold the firm that sold you those and find one that will work with you.  A good fitting will not happen in one sitting.  Getting the most out of expensive aids also takes time.  As others have said, either work with an audiologist that will take time with you or find one that will work with you and adjust the aids every time you want to come in.   I have had my first aids now for about five years.  They are about $2500 a pair Rexton digitals.  That included 1 year loss insurance and a couple years repair.  I’m now buying the repair at $100 each for a year at a time.  My audiologist had always made time to adjust the aids and recommended that I return once a every week or two for the first three months.  That gave me time to understand what worked and when they didn’t.  We’ve adjusted them as needed.  Recently I had to ask for a retesting without the aids because they don’t sound right.  They confirmed a slight loss of a band in one ear.  I’m in my 40s so they want to keep me happy.  They admit that the older people they treat don’t always take the time to return or find what can be made better.   Do youself a favor and ask for better service.  Your ears will greatly appreciate it.  Don’t stop until you are hearing all those things that you long ago forgot even made noise.   David

Response:

Part, but not necessarily all, of the problem is that you saw a dispenser rather than an audiologist. As you are, apparently, an experienced aid user, I will dispense with the usual stuff about not expecting too much and steep learning curves. Also you do not indicate the nature of your hearing loss. My advice would be to talk to hearing groups/doctors/strangers wearing hearing aids (we like to help) and track down a good audiologist in your area (I travelled 200 miles to get to my first one and it was worth it). If you find someone you will have another problem getting him to help with an aid fitted by someone else. But it should be possible to work around this – pay him on a time basis. I once visited a dispenser belonging to the mob who target Australian pensioners and, having previously dealt with an audiologist, I was amazed – pretty much the same treatment as you experienced. Not good enough. In fact verging on a racket.

Response:

OK, I'm ready. How do I go about this?

Question:

I’m sure I have hearing loss that can be helped with an hearing aid. How should I go about this?  I live in a city with a large, world famous medical clinic.  Do I go to them?  Do I look up "hearing aids" in the yellow pages?  What should I look out for?  Help!

Response:

Two ways: 1)  Research audiologists.  Find the best educated one near you. 2)  Go to an audiologist.  Ask "Who is the best audiologist in town?"  Go see     whoever is named. Bill M "Guppas" <guppa…@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:1123179276.484571.108640@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’m sure I have hearing loss that can be helped with an hearing aid. > How should I go about this?  I live in a city with a large, world > famous medical clinic.  Do I go to them?  Do I look up "hearing aids" > in the yellow pages?  What should I look out for?  Help!

Response:

On 4 Aug 2005 11:14:36 -0700, "Guppas" <guppa…@hotmail.com> wrote: >I’m sure I have hearing loss that can be helped with an hearing aid. >How should I go about this?  I live in a city with a large, world >famous medical clinic.  Do I go to them?  Do I look up "hearing aids" >in the yellow pages?  What should I look out for?  Help!

Ask those you know who are happy with their hearing aids where they got them (assuming you can find anyone in that situation.) Mike

Response:

On 4 Aug 2005 11:14:36 -0700, "Guppas" <guppa…@hotmail.com> wrote: >I’m sure I have hearing loss that can be helped with an hearing aid. >How should I go about this?  I live in a city with a large, world >famous medical clinic.  Do I go to them?  Do I look up "hearing aids" >in the yellow pages?  What should I look out for?  Help!

 I’m kinda  the ‘do it yourselfer’ type of guy and I want to control my aids from top to bottom.  They gotta have lots of features that I can adjust.  I’m gonna go with someone that will give me the tools to adjust my own digital aids and control which frequencies I want to hear more of of.   But I want support when I get frustrated or have problems.   Right now, that means www.americahears.com  and about $2500 for the pair of their best 16x digital aids.  But you may want to find a local audiologist in the yellow pages and give him your $5000 to do all the work for you.   Different stroke for different folks.

Response:

And if you have a heart attack I suppose you will do your own bypass. >From my own experience I would say that diagnosis, aid selection and

fitting and follow-up require the same order of skills as treating heart conditions. You need expert help and it is not impossible to find audiologists who will allow you to do a degree of tweaking yourself (search this group – I have never managed it but it has been done). If you are inclined to do it yourself, hurry while you still know everything – a situation with a short life.

Response:

Guppas wrote: > I’m sure I have hearing loss that can be helped with an hearing aid. > How should I go about this?  I live in a city with a large, world > famous medical clinic.  Do I go to them?  Do I look up "hearing aids" > in the yellow pages?  What should I look out for?  Help!

Before you start looking for a hearing aid, you should make sure that you actually have a hearing loss, what type of hearing loss it is, and whether it would be helped with a hearing aid.  Then do a little bit of research on your hearing loss before you arrange to see an audiologist.           You should discuss with your doctor whether or not your hearing loss is a progressive type or if it is likely to remain fairly stable, so that you know whether or not your HAs will eventually need to meet the needs of a higher loss.  HAs average life span, IIRC, is about 5 years. Woods

Response:

On 4 Aug 2005 11:14:36 -0700, "Guppas" <guppa…@hotmail.com> wrote: >I’m sure I have hearing loss that can be helped with an hearing aid. >How should I go about this?  I live in a city with a large, world >famous medical clinic.  Do I go to them?  Do I look up "hearing aids" >in the yellow pages?  What should I look out for?  Help!

It’s a crap-shoot.  But you might start by contacting the "famous medical clinic" and see if they dispense them.  Most hospitals have a dispensery associated with them. — Top 10 Conservative Idiots: http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/

Response:

Let us know the result.

Response:

This is sound advice except that some ENTs don’t know much about hearing aids. I delayed getting them for about five years because my ENT had the impression that they were no good. He was wrong. I agree – see an ENT but, if you still have hearing problems search out the best audiologist in your area. An if you are doubtfull about his recommendtions try the second-best one and compare. There are lots of hearing profs but you only have two ears and one life.

Response:

You should look for references in your area…It’s is a wise move to always first be checked by an ENT to be sure there is no medical problem…Once that is done a Traditional Dispenser or an Audiologist is fine if they have experience…There are so many new instruments on the market today that you want to be sure the person you select has the knowledge necessary to do a good job…ENT’s can also dispense but I will say that my experience has been that the medical model is not very conducive to dropping in when a problem occurs…ENT’s are used to seeing patients by appointment only and if your hearing aid dies on a Friday afternoon you need to be able to run in and get help…I’m sure there are many good ENT’s that fit aids but speaking from my own experience they have not been as accessible as I would like…Buying a hearing aid is a team effort between you and your Dispenser…You need to feel that you can express your needs and concerns openly…And most importantly that your hearing is more important than your money…Shop wisely and don’t be afraid to get up and go elsewhere…The experience can be very rewarding…Good luck…GG "Guppas" <guppa…@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:1123179276.484571.108640@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’m sure I have hearing loss that can be helped with an hearing aid. > How should I go about this?  I live in a city with a large, world > famous medical clinic.  Do I go to them?  Do I look up "hearing aids" > in the yellow pages?  What should I look out for?  Help!

Response:

Initially, get a medical exam from a medical doctor, not an audiologist.  If you visit your local medical clinic, ask for the ENT department… Get a comprehensive ear exam, either at the ENT clinic or subsequently at an audiologist clinic. Avoid "free" ear exams; and demand a written copy of your audiogram. A comprehensive ear exam with a written copy will cost you and/or your insurance between $100 and $200… Now, take copies of your audiogram, and visit many different hearing aid dispensers, including audiologists, Costco hearing centers, online dispensers like Genesis Labs and America Hears… Compare prices for identical hearing aids, demand detailed lists of services to be rendered under those prices, etc. Set up a trial with the model hearing aid you like best…  The dispenser must give you a 30 day money back offer; Costco and Genesis Labs and America Hears will give you a 60 day money back offer. IMPORTANT: Make certain you get this agreement in writing, and that the agreement specifies how much money you get back if you return the aids within the trial period… During this trial period, visit the dispenser whenever you want specific adjustments… You will have an opportunity to determine how good the services of the dispenser actually are… If you get sloppy, minimal service during the trial period, you cannot expect to get better service later on, right? Follow these simple directions, and – Hey! – you might end up with aids you like, reasonably well adjusted, and competitively priced… Good luck.

Response:

If possible I would start with an otologist before an ENT man.

Enjoy Great Fingr lakes Wines!

Response:

SenShore wrote: > If possible I would start with an otologist before an ENT man.

Why?  (Just wondering, is all). Woods – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> ———————————————————————— > Enjoy Great Fingr lakes Wines! > Click for Hector, New York Forecast > <http://www.wunderground.com/US/NY/Hector.html?bannertypeclick=default…>

Response:

And whichever aids you finally try, be aware that getting used to them is hard work – don’t be put off by your initial reaction – work with your dispenser/audiologist – discuss problems and follow his/her advice. The learning curve is quite steep initially but soon levels off if you keep the things in your ears rather than in your pocket or drawer. And don’t expect 20/20 hearing – maybe 10/10 which is fantastic compared with the alternative – remaining isolated.

Response:

trouble w/ goop

Question:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -jim wrote: > I’ve been wearing siemens triano cic for about a year although this is > my first summer experience. Seems I’m having to return them to the audi > once every couple of weeks for cleaning goop out of the sound entrance > on the outside of the cic. Each aid has been returned for repair which > I’m sure is just for cleaning. What should I do? I wear the aids 16 hrs > a day but I’m thinking maybe I should start  wearing them just for > special occasions like church gatherings, business meetings and the > like. Seems when I really need them one of them’s failed and has been > sent off to the repair shop. For example, I just returned from a > weekend family reunion. I had only one aid because the other one was > off for repair, a one week turn-around. The weather was hot and the > party was outside. By the end of the day the other one had failed. I > found I had to remove it and struggle hearing for the rest of the > evening. I wish I hadn’t attended. I hate that. Truthfully I need them > all the time, even for bird noises. I love my aids. > This typical of hearing aids? Are other brands more tollerant of these > types of conditions? > Jim

I have Siemens triano bte, and they konk out anytime I’ve been sweating in the slightest bit.  I have to take them out and clean all around the battery area, which gets orange gunk around and keeps the HAs from working. I use a toothpick with some soft cloth wrapped around the tip, and clean it up very, very gently. Never had this problem with my siemens music btes, and did a whole lot more with them than I have with these.  So, I’m thinking there’s some kind of defect with the design of these.  I’m pretty underwhelmed with them overall. Woods

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Wayne Boatwright wrote: > On Mon 01 Aug 2005 08:45:18a, jim wrote in alt.support.hearing-loss: >>I’ve been wearing siemens triano cic for about a year although this is >>my first summer experience. Seems I’m having to return them to the audi >>once every couple of weeks for cleaning goop out of the sound entrance >>on the outside of the cic. Each aid has been returned for repair which >>I’m sure is just for cleaning. What should I do? I wear the aids 16 hrs >>a day but I’m thinking maybe I should start  wearing them just for >>special occasions like church gatherings, business meetings and the >>like. Seems when I really need them one of them’s failed and has been >>sent off to the repair shop. For example, I just returned from a >>weekend family reunion. I had only one aid because the other one was >>off for repair, a one week turn-around. The weather was hot and the >>party was outside. By the end of the day the other one had failed. I >>found I had to remove it and struggle hearing for the rest of the >>evening. I wish I hadn’t attended. I hate that. Truthfully I need them >>all the time, even for bird noises. I love my aids. >>This typical of hearing aids? Are other brands more tollerant of these >>types of conditions? >>Jim > It’s perhaps more typical of cic’s and itc’s than it is for bte’s.  I > wouldn’t say that it’s typical of one brand more than another.

No, I’m getting orange goop in the battery compartment that makes my BTEs keep cutting out.  A pain in the backside.  My other BTEs never had this problem.  (I always take out my HAs when I sweat profusely, if I’m in extremely high humidity, or if it’s raining – still have the problem.   These HAs don’t even get into the bathroom if I’m going to take a shower, they’re left in another room). Woods

Response:

I wear BTEs and was given a Dry and Store with the purchase.  I have had times when it is very humid and one aid starts to make strange sounds. A night in the Dry and Store completely fixes it.  On other message boards I also read great things about the Dry and Store and how it extends the life of aids. So, I don’t know about the goop for sure, and I don’t know about CICs, but if humidity is the problem, the Dry and Store may help. Jan "jim" <jpe…@marlette.k12.mi.us> wrote in message

news:1122911118.653831.47780@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve been wearing siemens triano cic for about a year although this is > my first summer experience. Seems I’m having to return them to the audi > once every couple of weeks for cleaning goop out of the sound entrance > on the outside of the cic. Each aid has been returned for repair which > I’m sure is just for cleaning. What should I do? I wear the aids 16 hrs > a day but I’m thinking maybe I should start  wearing them just for > special occasions like church gatherings, business meetings and the > like. Seems when I really need them one of them’s failed and has been > sent off to the repair shop. For example, I just returned from a > weekend family reunion. I had only one aid because the other one was > off for repair, a one week turn-around. The weather was hot and the > party was outside. By the end of the day the other one had failed. I > found I had to remove it and struggle hearing for the rest of the > evening. I wish I hadn’t attended. I hate that. Truthfully I need them > all the time, even for bird noises. I love my aids. > This typical of hearing aids? Are other brands more tollerant of these > types of conditions? > Jim

Response:

"jim" <jpe…@marlette.k12.mi.us> wrote in message

news:1122911118.653831.47780@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve been wearing siemens triano cic for about a year although this is > my first summer experience. Seems I’m having to return them to the audi > once every couple of weeks for cleaning goop out of the sound entrance > on the outside of the cic. Each aid has been returned for repair which > I’m sure is just for cleaning. What should I do? I wear the aids 16 hrs > a day but I’m thinking maybe I should start  wearing them just for > special occasions like church gatherings, business meetings and the > like. Seems when I really need them one of them’s failed and has been > sent off to the repair shop. For example, I just returned from a > weekend family reunion. I had only one aid because the other one was > off for repair, a one week turn-around. The weather was hot and the > party was outside. By the end of the day the other one had failed. I > found I had to remove it and struggle hearing for the rest of the > evening. I wish I hadn’t attended. I hate that. Truthfully I need them > all the time, even for bird noises. I love my aids. > This typical of hearing aids? Are other brands more tollerant of these > types of conditions? > Jim

An advantage of BTE’s — if one breaks down, you still have an earmold that fits, and it doesn’t have to go along for repairs.  A loaner can be attached to the earmold and programmed to your profile.  That’s what was done for me when I lost the door to the battery compartment — the quality wasn’t quite as good, but I was still able to hear.

Response:

I believe the "orange goop" is rust…Try removing your batteries at night to allow the moisture trapped between it and the holder…In addition a Dry and Store does an excellent job of protecting your investment…GG "Woodswun" <woods…@tepidmail.com> wrote in message

news:ICyHe.1164$0m1.250@twister.nyroc.rr.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> On Mon 01 Aug 2005 08:45:18a, jim wrote in alt.support.hearing-loss: >>>I’ve been wearing siemens triano cic for about a year although this is >>>my first summer experience. Seems I’m having to return them to the audi >>>once every couple of weeks for cleaning goop out of the sound entrance >>>on the outside of the cic. Each aid has been returned for repair which >>>I’m sure is just for cleaning. What should I do? I wear the aids 16 hrs >>>a day but I’m thinking maybe I should start  wearing them just for >>>special occasions like church gatherings, business meetings and the >>>like. Seems when I really need them one of them’s failed and has been >>>sent off to the repair shop. For example, I just returned from a >>>weekend family reunion. I had only one aid because the other one was >>>off for repair, a one week turn-around. The weather was hot and the >>>party was outside. By the end of the day the other one had failed. I >>>found I had to remove it and struggle hearing for the rest of the >>>evening. I wish I hadn’t attended. I hate that. Truthfully I need them >>>all the time, even for bird noises. I love my aids. >>>This typical of hearing aids? Are other brands more tollerant of these >>>types of conditions? >>>Jim >> It’s perhaps more typical of cic’s and itc’s than it is for bte’s.  I >> wouldn’t say that it’s typical of one brand more than another. > No, I’m getting orange goop in the battery compartment that makes my BTEs > keep cutting out.  A pain in the backside.  My other BTEs never had this > problem.  (I always take out my HAs when I sweat profusely, if I’m in > extremely high humidity, or if it’s raining – still have the problem. > These HAs don’t even get into the bathroom if I’m going to take a shower, > they’re left in another room). > Woods

Response:

jim wrote: >  All good points. I’ve got the vacuum pump. I need needles. Where do > appropriate needles come from? I’ve got a dry and store too. I guess I > ought to start using it. > Thanks.

A lot of hearing aid dispensers will place the aid in a vacuum chamber for about 5 minutes or so – I don’t do this myself but this is supposed to remove the water from aids by boiling it off. It seems reasonable, and it might be an easier way to remove water. The pump I use is a commercial pump for removing water from AC systems. To remove wax and gunk, you probably have to use a needle. You’ll have to figure out how to do the connections. I use a small syringe press fitted into a length of vinyl tubing. There’s an inline fuel filter to catch any solid matter that passes the bit of cotton stuffed into the syringe. I use a 70’s VW Rabbit filter. The pump is a diaphragm type pump and there is some problem with getting water into the oil, this is probably reducing my vacuum but I have no gauge to read this. A piston pump would probably work better. I don’t remember where the needles are from. You have to grind the points off if you use medical tips. It should be the biggest gauge to fit into the receiver tube but you need some room for air to enter to be able to suck the water and gunk out. You should be able to clear your aid of water pretty easily using this. The biggest danger is pushing too hard on the receiver and dislodging it from the tubing. Be very careful. On newer aids, the glue joint should be pretty robust, you’re taking a chance on older aids. The vacuum chamber route is the safer, easier way. I recommend this. Don’t use the needle method unless you have a good idea of how to do this and the risks involved. I estimate that about half of repairs involving receiver replacement are not necessary; they just have to be cleaned. Not many places know how to do this type of service, too bad.

Response:

Gary G wrote: > I believe the "orange goop" is rust…Try removing your batteries at night > to allow the moisture trapped between it and the holder…In addition a Dry > and Store does an excellent job of protecting your investment…GG

That’s nice, but my point was that this is a new problem that came with the Siemens Triano and which did not exist with the Siemens music.  It’s not really feasible to stop the world so I can run home and put my HAs into a dry-and-store (or anything else) for a couple of hours because the dewpoint hit 70. Woods – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> "Woodswun" <woods…@tepidmail.com> wrote in message > news:ICyHe.1164$0m1.250@twister.nyroc.rr.com… >>Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>On Mon 01 Aug 2005 08:45:18a, jim wrote in alt.support.hearing-loss: >>>>I’ve been wearing siemens triano cic for about a year although this is >>>>my first summer experience. Seems I’m having to return them to the audi >>>>once every couple of weeks for cleaning goop out of the sound entrance >>>>on the outside of the cic. Each aid has been returned for repair which >>>>I’m sure is just for cleaning. What should I do? I wear the aids 16 hrs >>>>a day but I’m thinking maybe I should start  wearing them just for >>>>special occasions like church gatherings, business meetings and the >>>>like. Seems when I really need them one of them’s failed and has been >>>>sent off to the repair shop. For example, I just returned from a >>>>weekend family reunion. I had only one aid because the other one was >>>>off for repair, a one week turn-around. The weather was hot and the >>>>party was outside. By the end of the day the other one had failed. I >>>>found I had to remove it and struggle hearing for the rest of the >>>>evening. I wish I hadn’t attended. I hate that. Truthfully I need them >>>>all the time, even for bird noises. I love my aids. >>>>This typical of hearing aids? Are other brands more tollerant of these >>>>types of conditions? >>>>Jim >>>It’s perhaps more typical of cic’s and itc’s than it is for bte’s.  I >>>wouldn’t say that it’s typical of one brand more than another. >>No, I’m getting orange goop in the battery compartment that makes my BTEs >>keep cutting out.  A pain in the backside.  My other BTEs never had this >>problem.  (I always take out my HAs when I sweat profusely, if I’m in >>extremely high humidity, or if it’s raining – still have the problem. >>These HAs don’t even get into the bathroom if I’m going to take a shower, >>they’re left in another room). >>Woods

Response:

 All good points. I’ve got the vacuum pump. I need needles. Where do appropriate needles come from? I’ve got a dry and store too. I guess I ought to start using it. Thanks.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -jim wrote: > I’ve been wearing siemens triano cic for about a year although this is > my first summer experience. Seems I’m having to return them to the audi > once every couple of weeks for cleaning goop out of the sound entrance > on the outside of the cic. Each aid has been returned for repair which > I’m sure is just for cleaning. What should I do? I wear the aids 16 hrs > a day but I’m thinking maybe I should start  wearing them just for > special occasions like church gatherings, business meetings and the > like. Seems when I really need them one of them’s failed and has been > sent off to the repair shop. For example, I just returned from a > weekend family reunion. I had only one aid because the other one was > off for repair, a one week turn-around. The weather was hot and the > party was outside. By the end of the day the other one had failed. I > found I had to remove it and struggle hearing for the rest of the > evening. I wish I hadn’t attended. I hate that. Truthfully I need them > all the time, even for bird noises. I love my aids. > This typical of hearing aids? Are other brands more tollerant of these > types of conditions? > Jim

I use a vacuum pump capable of at least 22" Hg, and a suitable needle tip to clean out aids, in your case it’s probably water. You have to be careful about pushing any earwax in the receiver port. This is done by listening to the airflow, while probing into the receiver tube. Stop when you hear any obstruction to the flow until it clears out. In your case if it’s water, it should take less that a minute. Tough impacted earwax could take a while. You could move to a colder state, this would help a lot. ;’)

Response:

On Mon 01 Aug 2005 08:45:18a, jim wrote in alt.support.hearing-loss: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve been wearing siemens triano cic for about a year although this is > my first summer experience. Seems I’m having to return them to the audi > once every couple of weeks for cleaning goop out of the sound entrance > on the outside of the cic. Each aid has been returned for repair which > I’m sure is just for cleaning. What should I do? I wear the aids 16 hrs > a day but I’m thinking maybe I should start  wearing them just for > special occasions like church gatherings, business meetings and the > like. Seems when I really need them one of them’s failed and has been > sent off to the repair shop. For example, I just returned from a > weekend family reunion. I had only one aid because the other one was > off for repair, a one week turn-around. The weather was hot and the > party was outside. By the end of the day the other one had failed. I > found I had to remove it and struggle hearing for the rest of the > evening. I wish I hadn’t attended. I hate that. Truthfully I need them > all the time, even for bird noises. I love my aids. > This typical of hearing aids? Are other brands more tollerant of these > types of conditions? > Jim

It’s perhaps more typical of cic’s and itc’s than it is for bte’s.  I wouldn’t say that it’s typical of one brand more than another. — Wayne Boatwright *

Sound Wizard etc.

Question:

Thank you all for your helpful suggestions.  I think that all of the explanations suggested for the superiority in some situations of headphones over hearing aids probably apply to some degree.  SJF, thank you for your explanation of what happens as sound travels across a room.  I’ve been trying to explain this to my audiologist, and this will help. I do not have telecoils — had them on an earlier set of HA’s and never could get them to work. The Phonak Microlink plugs directly into the HA’s, which I don’t want — I have itchy ears and like to give them a rest when I can. The Sound Wizard includes uni- and omnidirectional mics, volume and tone controls, an infrared receiver set to the frequency most commonly used in theaters, a phone module, etc.  Googling tells me that prices vary considerably, but it’s not always clear exactly what is included in the package and what is considered an accessory. Again, thanks for the help.  If and when I get the system, I’ll send back a report. Helco

Response:

"helco" <he…@insightbb.com> wrote in message

news:PmyFe.182064$x96.18674@attbi_s72… >I am considering getting a Sound Wizard ALD and wonder if anyone here has >experience with this or similar devices. > My hearing loss is severe in the upper registers, moderate in the lower

<snip> The headphones have a much wider frequency response, and often a wider dynamic range. Hearing aids are limited from about 250HZ to no more that 7kHz. Add compression to limit loud sounds, and you have your answer. Tom

Response:

> So, I have two questions: > 1.  Why would I hear better with across-the-board amplification via ordinary > headphones than with my sophisticated HA’s?  I suspect that the HA’s pick up > too many other high-pitched sounds such as reverberations in rooms that are > poorly soundproofed, whereas the headphones block out all extraneous sounds. > Does this sound reasonable?  Any other ideas?

I have a somewhat similar experience but a different analysis of the cause. My experience with audio and electronics tells me that the sound received by headphones, however linked to TV or radio, is transmitted without alteration.  But transmitted across the room by sound waves from TV or radio there is absorption, particularly of higher frequencies by room furnishings. Further, the sound is muddied by room echos (reverberation). A related observation is that judging the hearing aids by listening to TV is not a good method. I normally listen to TV without headphones but I have a hardwired hi-fi pair that are often called into use.  I put them on over my BTE aids since I really need the high frequency boost the aids provide. > 2.  Does anyone have experience with the Sound Wizard amplifiers?

Not familiar with that item. SJF

Response:

The fact that headphones block out background noise is probably sufficient to account for your experience. Many HA users find headphones good not only for TV but also for telephone. Also you should experiment with using your T-coil with the headphones – this way you block out ALL background noise (though I find normal use of the HA mke fine). I don’t know the Sound Wizard – try a search of this group. There is a similar system made by Phonak (called Microlink). The receiver is fitted to your hearing aid (not only Phonaks) so, again, you bypass background noise. You will find many reports on Microlink in this group – maybe on the Wizard as well. I also seem to recall posts about other systems of this type – try searches such as ‘meetings’ ‘lectures’ etc.

Response:

Sound Wizard threw up 17 hits in this group.

Response:

I am considering getting a Sound Wizard ALD and wonder if anyone here has experience with this or similar devices. My hearing loss is severe in the upper registers, moderate in the lower registers.  I have digital BTE Beltone aids that help me greatly in most situations, but I still have some difficulties that my audiologist and I are working at improving.  I am puzzled because I seem to hear sounds such as the radio better if I wear plain old Walkman headphones w/o the HA’s than if I use the HA’s alone.  I also have headphones that receive infrared transmissions from the television, and I hear much better with those than with the HA’s (though still need the closed captions somewhat). So, I have two questions: 1.  Why would I hear better with across-the-board amplification via ordinary headphones than with my sophisticated HA’s?  I suspect that the HA’s pick up too many other high-pitched sounds such as reverberations in rooms that are poorly soundproofed, whereas the headphones block out all extraneous sounds. Does this sound reasonable?  Any other ideas? 2.  Does anyone have experience with the Sound Wizard amplifiers?  I was thinking they might be helpful when I’m in meetings, with people speaking from different directions and sometimes rather poor sound quality.  How would they work in larger meetings where the sound is amplified?  (I’ve given up on such meetings with my HA’s alone.)  Also, I would like to use my own headset instead of the ones supplied by theaters etc.  Recently I had a set that didn’t work and I was in a (live) theater where I couldn’t just barge out of my seat and ask for another set. Thanks in advance for any replies.  Sorry for this rather long post, but I’d like to tap into the expertise of this group.

Response:

MD HA

Question:

What type of hearing aids are more suitable for the type of hearing loss that usually comes with Meniere’s disease? I mean distorted sound and  hyperacusia. Or would it be the usual answer: every patient is different?

Response:

It certainly would be that everyone is different,…but with the varying nature of Menieres a volume control is a must…After that it all becomes subjective…GG "wasknijper" <w.knij…@unimail.nl> wrote in message

news:42be5fea$0$1587$ba620dc5@text.nova.planet.nl… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What type of hearing aids are more suitable for the type of hearing loss > that usually comes with Meniere’s disease? > I mean distorted sound and  hyperacusia. Or would it be the usual answer: > every patient is different?

Response:

I've had Phonak Savia's for 10 days now

Question:

I was wearing Oticon Adapto for 3.5 years CIC’s.  The Phonak Savia’s are   so different.  First, I find them very loud.  My audi says that I will get used ot it.  Then he will turn them up again.  Any comments about getting used to the loudness.  I find it difficult to hear speech. Also I can’t distinguish the programs yet.  Again, I’m only wearing them for 10 days. Any comments or experiences? Thanks Rose

Response:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:10:59 GMT, rose <Roseath…@shaw.ca> wrote: >I was wearing Oticon Adapto for 3.5 years CIC’s.  The Phonak Savia’s are >  so different.  First, I find them very loud.  My audi says that I will >get used ot it.  Then he will turn them up again.  Any comments about >getting used to the loudness.  I find it difficult to hear speech. >Also I can’t distinguish the programs yet.  Again, I’m only wearing them >for 10 days. >Any comments or experiences? >Thanks >Rose

Let your audiologist wear them for a day. Mike

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -alf…@comcast.net wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:10:59 GMT, rose <Roseath…@shaw.ca> wrote: >>I was wearing Oticon Adapto for 3.5 years CIC’s.  The Phonak Savia’s are >> so different.  First, I find them very loud.  My audi says that I will >>get used ot it.  Then he will turn them up again.  Any comments about >>getting used to the loudness.  I find it difficult to hear speech. >>Also I can’t distinguish the programs yet.  Again, I’m only wearing them >>for 10 days. >>Any comments or experiences? >>Thanks >>Rose > Let your audiologist wear them for a day. > Mike

Thanks for the comment.  Hopefully I’ll get used to them. Rose

Response:

It has been my experience with Phonak products that they start out seeming loud, ( I think of it as being bright and sharp) but the Savias allow for a great deal of configuration, and the audiologist needs to understand what is possible.  I believe there are 20 frequency bands which can be adjusted, and each programme can be individualsied for each set of different listening circumstances.  Perhaps I was fortunate in that we started out with mine being fitted to reflect how I listened with my old Claros, and the second set of adjustments have so far been minor but have made a huge difference.  As a simple instance: to combat the loudness it may make sense to have the default volume reduced, or in my case, I asked for a small adjustment of some of the low frequency settings.  The savias have two microphones and these add to the clarity and can also of course, create some strange listening experiences if the programmes are not set correctly. I recommend persevering for a little while and becoming as assertive as you can about what you believe needs to be adjusted.  For me the savias are the best hearing aids I have ever worn by the legnth of the straight, but of course, hearing loss and how we listen are complex things and individual experiences and requirements vary significantly. Vaughan. In article <D77te.1736163$Xk.1349339@pd7tw3no>, Roseath…@shaw.ca says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I was wearing Oticon Adapto for 3.5 years CIC’s.  The Phonak Savia’s are >   so different.  First, I find them very loud.  My audi says that I will > get used ot it.  Then he will turn them up again.  Any comments about > getting used to the loudness.  I find it difficult to hear speech. > Also I can’t distinguish the programs yet.  Again, I’m only wearing them > for 10 days. > Any comments or experiences? > Thanks > Rose

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Vaughan Dodd wrote: > It has been my experience with Phonak products that they start out seeming loud, ( I > think of it as being bright and sharp) but the Savias allow for a great deal of > configuration, and the audiologist needs to understand what is possible.  I believe there > are 20 frequency bands which can be adjusted, and each programme can be individualsied > for each set of different listening circumstances.  Perhaps I was fortunate in that we > started out with mine being fitted to reflect how I listened with my old Claros, and the > second set of adjustments have so far been minor but have made a huge difference.  As a > simple instance: to combat the loudness it may make sense to have the default volume > reduced, or in my case, I asked for a small adjustment of some of the low frequency > settings.  The savias have two microphones and these add to the clarity and can also of > course, create some strange listening experiences if the programmes are not set > correctly. > I recommend persevering for a little while and becoming as assertive as you can about > what you believe needs to be adjusted.  For me the savias are the best hearing aids I > have ever worn by the legnth of the straight, but of course, hearing loss and how we > listen are complex things and individual experiences and requirements vary significantly. > Vaughan. > In article <D77te.1736163$Xk.1349339@pd7tw3no>, Roseath…@shaw.ca says… >>I was wearing Oticon Adapto for 3.5 years CIC’s.  The Phonak Savia’s are >>  so different.  First, I find them very loud.  My audi says that I will >>get used ot it.  Then he will turn them up again.  Any comments about >>getting used to the loudness.  I find it difficult to hear speech. >>Also I can’t distinguish the programs yet.  Again, I’m only wearing them >>for 10 days. >>Any comments or experiences? >>Thanks >>Rose

Thanks for the advice.  I have them for a 90 day trial period. The prescription for thses are different from my old ones, the CIC’s (Oticon).  I’m visiting the audi next Thursday for an adjustment. Rose

Response: